From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EF36B0069 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by faas10 with SMTP id s10so1469620faa.14 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:25:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20111115083646.GA21468@darkstar.nay.redhat.com> <20111115144943.GJ30922@google.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:25:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCCH percpu: add cpunum param in per_cpu_ptr_to_phys From: Tejun Heo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Young Cc: Dave Young , gregkh@suse.de, cl@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Hello, On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Dave Young wro= te: >> Does this matter? =A0If it's not a performance critical path, I'd rather >> keep the generic funtionality. > > Hi, why not? the code is redundant, it's an improvement of the code, isn'= t it? > Also, kernel code size will be smaller. (scratching head...) Ummm... I'm not sure whether it's an improvement or not. The contest is between loss of currently unused functionality and meaningless optimization. I vote for status quo. Thanks. --=20 tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org