From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador.vilardaga@gmail.com>
To: Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mm,hugetlb: Change mechanism to detect a COW on private mapping
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 08:53:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOXBz7gP9Zur3804zJhxFhSjprNc-gfi4vg7w2g07HA2S9EkcA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8287af7-08bd-491c-bca8-70af107e0fea@igalia.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 482 bytes --]
El sáb, 28 jun 2025, 11:22, Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com> escribió:
>
> Sorry for the late response. I've changed to a different project and
> won't have time to work on this bug anymore. But, finally, I find time
> on the weekend to conduct the testing. It appears that the ABBA deadlock
> still exists. Please refer to the log:
>
Thanks Galvin for testing!
I'll have a look when I'm back but I suspect thiz wants to be a trylock and
bailout if we can't take it.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 897 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-29 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 10:28 [PATCH v3 0/5] Misc rework on hugetlb faulting path Oscar Salvador
2025-06-27 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm,hugetlb: Change mechanism to detect a COW on private mapping Oscar Salvador
2025-06-28 9:22 ` Gavin Guo
2025-06-29 6:53 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2025-06-29 17:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-29 20:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-30 13:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-27 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mm,hugetlb: Sort out folio locking in the faulting path Oscar Salvador
2025-06-27 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mm,hugetlb: Rename anon_rmap to new_anon_folio and make it boolean Oscar Salvador
2025-06-27 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mm,hugetlb: Drop obsolete comment about non-present pte and second faults Oscar Salvador
2025-06-27 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mm,hugetlb: Drop unlikelys from hugetlb_fault Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOXBz7gP9Zur3804zJhxFhSjprNc-gfi4vg7w2g07HA2S9EkcA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=osalvador.vilardaga@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).