From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:42:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jFPYYP=eL72V6MmW2fcXFP3PfQfcO+zYV4NN7rdu1ksg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458939566.5501.5.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Verma, Vishal L
<vishal.l.verma@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 03:45 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:17:30PM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
>> >
>> > dax_do_io (called for read() or write() for a dax file system) may
>> > fail
>> > in the presence of bad blocks or media errors. Since we expect that
>> > a
>> > write should clear media errors on nvdimms, make dax_do_io fall
>> > back to
>> > the direct_IO path, which will send down a bio to the driver, which
>> > can
>> > then attempt to clear the error.
>> Leave the fallback on -EIO to the callers please. They generally
>> call
>> __blockdev_direct_IO anyway, so it should actually become simpler
>> that
>> way.
>
> I thought of this, but made the retrying happen in the wrapper so that
> it can be centralized. If the callers were to become responsible for
> the retry, then any new callers of dax_do_io might not realize they are
> responsible for retrying, and hit problems.
That's their prerogative otherwise you are precluding an alternate
handling of a dax_do_io() failure. Maybe a fs or upper layer can
recover in a different manner than re-submit the I/O to the
__blockdev_direct_IO path.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-25 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 23:17 [PATCH 0/5] dax: handling of media errors Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] block, dax: pass blk_dax_ctl through to drivers Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] dax: fallback from pmd to pte on error Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] dax: enable dax in the presence of known media errors (badblocks) Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:23 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors Vishal Verma
2016-03-25 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 21:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 21:03 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 21:20 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-28 20:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-28 23:34 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-29 18:57 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-29 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-30 7:49 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-01 19:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-04-04 12:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io Vishal Verma
2016-03-25 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 20:59 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 21:42 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2016-03-25 22:36 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-26 16:53 ` hch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPcyv4jFPYYP=eL72V6MmW2fcXFP3PfQfcO+zYV4NN7rdu1ksg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).