Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: fix validation of unsupported HugeTLB orders
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 16:20:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CDC3B454-CBB4-428D-A97F-B3B8414BBC07@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-194806@kernel.org>



> On Nov 3, 2026, at 16:13, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] mm/hugetlb: boot BUG_ON() in hugetlb_init() when HPAGE_SHIFT is 0 on powerpc
> --
> 
> commit 83959b12982c256d20ca0de51021b3beae201569
> Author: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
> 
> mm/hugetlb: fix validation of unsupported HugeTLB orders
> 
> This commit replaces BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID() with MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON() in
> hugetlb_init() so that configurations where HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER exceeds
> MAX_FOLIO_ORDER are rejected at build time when constant or via BUG_ON() at
> runtime otherwise.
> 
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index ff9dbfbc7a961..e21ac667694bd 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -4181,7 +4181,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
>> 
>> 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof_field(struct page, private) * BITS_PER_BYTE <
>> 			__NR_HPAGEFLAGS);
>> -	BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER);
>> +	MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER);
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Will placing MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON() before the hugepages_supported() check in
> hugetlb_init() trigger a boot BUG_ON() on architectures like PowerPC
> Book3S-64 when huge pages are unsupported at runtime?

Yeah, it's easy to fix, but I'll wait another day before updating it—just
in case others have feedback.

Thanks,
Muchun

> 
> On CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64, arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h defines HPAGE_SHIFT
> as a runtime unsigned int variable:
> 
>    extern unsigned int hpage_shift;
>    #define HPAGE_SHIFT hpage_shift
>    ...
>    #define HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER (HPAGE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
> 
> Because hpage_shift is not a compile-time constant, MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON()
> expands to a runtime BUG_ON(HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER).
> 
> When huge pages are not supported by the platform or are disabled at boot
> (for example, when hugetlbpage_init_defaultsize() in
> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c finds no supported huge page sizes),
> hpage_shift remains 0, which hugepages_supported() checks:
> 
>    static inline bool hugepages_supported(void)
>    {
>            if (hugetlb_disabled)
>                    return false;
> 
>            return HPAGE_SHIFT != 0;
>    }
> 
> Evaluating HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER before checking hugepages_supported() computes
> (0U - PAGE_SHIFT) in unsigned int arithmetic, wrapping around to a large
> unsigned value that exceeds MAX_FOLIO_ORDER and hits BUG_ON().
> 
> Should MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER) be moved
> after the if (!hugepages_supported()) block in hugetlb_init(), similar to how
> hugepage_init() in mm/huge_memory.c checks has_transparent_hugepage() before
> evaluating MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER > MAX_PAGE_ORDER)?
> 
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103023831.1805473-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com?part=1



      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03  2:38 [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: fix validation of unsupported HugeTLB orders Muchun Song
2026-11-03  8:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03  8:20   ` Muchun Song [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CDC3B454-CBB4-428D-A97F-B3B8414BBC07@linux.dev \
    --to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox