From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Yang Shi" <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
"Miaohe Lin" <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
"Kefeng Wang" <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
"Yu Zhao" <yuzhao@google.com>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/mm: make file-backed THP split work by setting force option
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:42:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D78PT6GILTYB.2QVXGSIG7YO9Y@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d66cea11-9522-43f4-8590-2e11ed43a8e5@redhat.com>
On Wed Jan 22, 2025 at 10:27 AM EST, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 22.01.25 16:16, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On Wed Jan 22, 2025 at 9:26 AM EST, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 22.01.25 13:40, Zi Yan wrote:
>>>> Commit acd7ccb284b8 ("mm: shmem: add large folio support for tmpfs")
>>>> changes huge=always to allocate THP/mTHP based on write size and
>>>> split_huge_page_test does not write PMD size data, so file-back THP is not
>>>> created during the test.
>>>
>>> Just curious, why can't we write PMD size data instead, to avoid messing
>>> with the "force" option?
>>
>> It also works. I used "force", because I notice that it is intended for
>> testing. Using it might be more future proof, in case huge=always changes
>> its semantics again in the future.
>
> I recall discussing with Hugh in an upstream call that "force" is a
> relict from older times, so naturally I would have just adjusted the
> test case to trigger the PMD scenario. No strong opinion, though, was
> just wondering.
Got it. Let me change it and resend. Thank you for the feedback.
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-22 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-22 12:40 [PATCH 1/3] selftests/mm: make file-backed THP split work by setting force option Zi Yan
2025-01-22 12:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/huge_memory: allow split shmem large folio to any lower order Zi Yan
2025-01-22 14:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-22 12:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/mm: test splitting file-backed THP " Zi Yan
2025-01-22 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/mm: make file-backed THP split work by setting force option David Hildenbrand
2025-01-22 15:16 ` Zi Yan
2025-01-22 15:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-22 15:42 ` Zi Yan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D78PT6GILTYB.2QVXGSIG7YO9Y@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox