Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: <kernel-team@meta.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>,  <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<longman@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 <david@kernel.org>, <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	<Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,  <vbabka@suse.cz>, <rppt@kernel.org>,
	<surenb@google.com>, <mhocko@suse.com>,  <osalvador@suse.de>,
	<ziy@nvidia.com>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	 <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>, <rakie.kim@sk.com>,
	<byungchul@sk.com>,  <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	<apopple@nvidia.com>,  <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	<yuanchu@google.com>, <weixugc@google.com>,
	 <yury.norov@gmail.com>, <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	<mhiramat@kernel.org>,  <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	<tj@kernel.org>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,  <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	<sj@kernel.org>, <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	 <npache@redhat.com>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	 <baohua@kernel.org>, <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	<muchun.song@linux.dev>,  <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>,
	<chengming.zhou@linux.dev>, <jannh@google.com>,
	 <linmiaohe@huawei.com>, <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
	<pfalcato@suse.de>,  <rientjes@google.com>,
	<shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, <riel@surriel.com>,
	 <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, <cl@gentwo.org>,
	<roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,  <chrisl@kernel.org>,
	<kasong@tencent.com>, <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	 <nphamcs@gmail.com>, <bhe@redhat.com>,
	<zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,  <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	<owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] __GFP_UNMAPPED and __GFP_PRIVATE follow up
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 09:43:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIJ5IBGSO0OC.1S6AARO01CD6T@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agYJcRgOHho8upVv@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>

On Thu May 14, 2026 at 5:42 PM UTC, Gregory Price wrote:
...
> Maybe we could modify alloc_flags to be a struct, and export that
> without being tied to down to a 32/64-bit flag field - and mark certain
> sets of alloc flags verboten (internally controlled / controlled by GFP
> flags, and will either be ignored or cause a BUG()).
>
> Then we could get something like:
>
>     struct alloc_flags {
>         /* 
> 	 * internal only: will be ignored, cleared, or cause BUG() if used,
> 	 * or should be applied via the appropriate __GFP flag.
> 	 */
>         uint64_t wmark_min : 1;
>         uint64_t wmark_low : 1;
>         uint64_t wmark_high : 1;
> 	... etc ...
> 	/* 
> 	 * external context flags
> 	 * allows explicit access to certain resources
> 	 */
> 	uint64_t cma          : 1; /* allows access to CMA regions */
> 	uint64_t unmapped     : 1; /* return pages in unmapped state */
> 	uint64_t managed_node : 1; /* allows access to managed node */
> 	... etc ...
>     };
>
>     ___alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(..., struct alloc_context *ac) {
>         ac->flags.wmark_low = 1;
> 	...
> 	prepare_alloc_pages(..., ac);
> 	ac->flags.nofrag = alloc_flags_nofragment(...)
>
> 	/* First allocation attempt */
>         page = get_page_from_freelist(alloc_gfp, order, &ac);
> 	...
>     }
>
>     __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(...) {
>         struct alloc_context ac = {};
>
> 	___alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(..., ac);
>     }
>
>     __alloc_frozen_pages_context_noprof(..., struct alloc_flags *aflags) {
>         struct alloc_context ac = {};
> 	
>         /* Snapshot to prevent external changes */
> 	ac.flags = aflags ? *aflags : 0;
>
>         sanitize_alloc_flags(&ac.flags); /* BUG() on insanity */
>         ___alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(..., ac);
>     }

Yeah, I have had a similar thought before. In fact, I wonder if we could
have a pointer in there that effectively allows you to replace
NODE_DATA? I think that would be a more general mechanism to achieve
that `managed_node` thing?

My original motive for that was: if we could get the allocator to stop
[unconditionally] mutating global variables it would make it easier to
test.

My feeling from poking around in the code is that setting this up is
actually quite a big job in page_alloc.c. But, I think it could be done
in a way that leaves the code better instead of worse.

There might be some annoying stuff like "turning these things that are
currently function arguments into struct fields effectively causes a
register spill and this code is hot enough for that to matter"? But that
seems like a bridge to cross if we come to it, not something to
premature-optimise over. (Do register spills matter in 2026 anyway?
I think registers and the stack are kinda virtual?)

(Sorry this is such a vague thumbs up without really contributing
anything but I'm just giving what I've got :D)


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-14 17:42 [RFC] __GFP_UNMAPPED and __GFP_PRIVATE follow up Gregory Price
2026-05-15  9:43 ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2026-05-15 15:48   ` Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DIJ5IBGSO0OC.1S6AARO01CD6T@google.com \
    --to=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox