Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>
To: "Petr Tesarik" <ptesarik@suse.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: remove NODE_RECLAIM_xxx macros
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:32:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJ69AE1CHPJC.3H4BPJUL9YYOV@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611124501.1465806-1-ptesarik@suse.com>

On Thu Jun 11, 2026 at 12:45 PM UTC, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> Change node_reclaim() to return a bool indicating whether any
> pages have been reclaimed, because that's the only information
> needed by the only caller, get_page_from_freelist().
>
> Originally, I wanted to convert the preprocessor macros to an
> enum, but I couldn't find any explicit use of NODE_RECLAIM_SOME
> and NODE_RECLAIM_SUCCESS. That's because they are typecast from
> a bool. 

I'm slightly confused by the "typecast from a bool" thing - nr_reclaim
returns nr_reclaimed and then node_reclaim()'s caller gets that value
directly - is that what you're referring to?

> This seemed a bit fragile, 

.. Which, yeah, is awkward, thanks for fixing it.

> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 3f3ff25e561ac..64f6b649eeac1 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -7786,9 +7786,9 @@ static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	return sc->nr_reclaimed;
>  }
>  
> -int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> +bool node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)

I really dislike returning bools with no obvious polarity. Personally I
would keep NODE_RECLAIM_*, (optionally convert to an enum), move the
comments to the definition of the NODE_RECLAIM_ thingies instead of
get_page_from_freelist(), and fix node_reclaim() to return
NODE_RECLAIM_{SUCCESS,SOME} expliticly.

I realise this philosophy is not favourable to concision though, I won't
die on that hill but could we at least get a comment on node_reclaim()'s
defintion...


> -			ret = node_reclaim(zone->zone_pgdat, gfp_mask, order);
> -			switch (ret) {
> -			case NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN:
> -				/* did not scan */
> -				continue;
> -			case NODE_RECLAIM_FULL:
> -				/* scanned but unreclaimable */
> +			if (!node_reclaim(zone->zone_pgdat, gfp_mask, order))
>  				continue;
> -			default:
> -				/* did we reclaim enough */
> -				if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> -					ac->highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags))
> -					goto try_this_zone;
>  
> +			/* did we reclaim enough */
> +			if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, mark,
> +					       ac->highest_zoneidx, alloc_flags))
>  				continue;
> -			}
>  		}

... or keep the intermediate variable and do:

	bool reclaimed_some = node_reclaim(...):

Since then the variable name at least tells you what you're looking at
without needing to jump into the function implementation.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11 12:45 [PATCH 1/1] mm: remove NODE_RECLAIM_xxx macros Petr Tesarik
2026-06-11 13:32 ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2026-06-11 13:57   ` Petr Tesarik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJ69AE1CHPJC.3H4BPJUL9YYOV@linux.dev \
    --to=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox