From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "Wei Yang" <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <david@kernel.org>, <ljs@kernel.org>,
<riel@surriel.com>, <liam@infradead.org>, <vbabka@kernel.org>,
<harry@kernel.org>, <jannh@google.com>, <sj@kernel.org>,
<balbirs@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, "Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [Patch mm-hotfixes v4] mm/page_vma_mapped: fix device-private PMD handling
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 15:39:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJIDV5DKIKAV.1D2ELFPGLIOSP@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624065353.1622-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On Wed Jun 24, 2026 at 2:53 AM EDT, Wei Yang wrote:
> Commit 65edfda6f3f2 ("mm/rmap: extend rmap and migration support
> device-private entries") introduced the concept of device-private
> PMD entries, but did not correctly update the rmap walk code to
> account for them.
>
> As a result, when page_vma_mapped_walk() encounters device-private
> PMD entries, it takes no action other than to acquire the PMD lock
> and exit.
>
> However this is highly problematic for two reasons - firstly,
> device private entries possess a PFN so check_pmd() needs to be
> called to ensure an overlapping PFN range.
>
> Secondly, and more importantly, if PVMW_MIGRATION is set the
> caller assumes the returned entry is a migration entry, resulting
> in memory corruption when the caller tries to interpret the device
> private entry as such.
>
> In addition, commit 146287290023 ("mm/huge_memory: implement
> device-private THP splitting") allowed device private PMDs to be
> split like THP mappings, but again did not update this code path.
>
> As a result, we might race a PMD split prior to acquiring the PMD
> lock.
>
> This patch addresses all of these issues by invoking check_pmd(),
> ensuring PMVW_MIGRATION is not set and checks whether a split raced
> us we do for PMD THP and migration entries.
>
> Fixes: 65edfda6f3f2 ("mm/rmap: extend rmap and migration support device-private entries")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
> Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
> Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>
> ---
> v4:
> * refine subject and commit log based on Lorenzo's suggestion
> * put pmd device-private entry handling in its own if branch,
> suggested by Lorenzo
>
> v3:
> * remove cleanup part, only fix the issue for device-private entry
> * refine user effect description based on Lorenzo's suggestion
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616063436.20455-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com/T/#u
> * specify the possible error case of current code and user visible effect
> * besides fix, cleanup the pmd entry handling based on David's suggestion
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260508013728.21285-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com/
> ---
> mm/page_vma_mapped.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
LGTM. The discussion from the patch history is very valuable. Thanks.
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 6:53 [Patch mm-hotfixes v4] mm/page_vma_mapped: fix device-private PMD handling Wei Yang
2026-06-24 8:57 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-25 9:57 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-25 10:37 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-25 11:25 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-25 11:42 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-25 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2026-06-25 13:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-25 11:12 ` Balbir Singh
2026-06-26 0:44 ` Wei Yang
2026-06-26 0:58 ` Andrew Morton
2026-06-25 19:39 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-06-26 10:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-26 10:42 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-26 11:31 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-26 13:24 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-26 13:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-26 13:27 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-26 13:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJIDV5DKIKAV.1D2ELFPGLIOSP@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox