From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "Ye Liu" <ye.liu@linux.dev>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mm/page_owner: hoist CONFIG_MEMCG to function level for print_page_owner_memcg()
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:52:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJJ7HMFDHGXY.39KA8I45KM8Z4@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626024550.25677-4-ye.liu@linux.dev>
On Thu Jun 25, 2026 at 10:45 PM EDT, Ye Liu wrote:
> The print_page_owner_memcg() function has CONFIG_MEMCG guarding its
> entire body via #ifdef inside the function, which leaves a no-op
no-op might not be accurate, since the purpose is not to change
scnprintf() return values from prior invocations. Maybe just remove
"no-op" in the commit message to avoid confusion.
> { return ret; } when the config is disabled. Hoist the #ifdef to the
> top level so the real implementation and the empty stub are two clearly
> separated definitions.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
> ---
> mm/page_owner.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> +#else
> +static inline int print_page_owner_memcg(char *kbuf, size_t count, int ret,
> + struct page *page)
> +{
> + return ret;
It is not obvious why we need to return ret here, until I find that ret
cumulates scnprintf() return values.
> +}
> +#endif
>
> static ssize_t
> print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_t count, unsigned long pfn,
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 2:45 [PATCH v2 0/6] mm/page_owner: misc cleanups Ye Liu
2026-06-26 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm/page_owner: extract skip_buddy_pages() helper to unify buddy page skipping Ye Liu
2026-06-26 18:35 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-26 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/page_owner: use MIGRATE_REASON_NONE instead of -1 for last_migrate_reason Ye Liu
2026-06-26 18:45 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-26 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm/page_owner: hoist CONFIG_MEMCG to function level for print_page_owner_memcg() Ye Liu
2026-06-26 18:52 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-06-26 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm/page_owner: add missing newline to count_threshold format string Ye Liu
2026-06-26 18:53 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-26 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm/page_owner: move free_ts_nsec output to free section in __dump_page_owner() Ye Liu
2026-06-26 18:55 ` Zi Yan
2026-06-26 2:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm/page_owner: drop redundant page_owner prefix from static symbols Ye Liu
2026-06-26 18:56 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJJ7HMFDHGXY.39KA8I45KM8Z4@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ye.liu@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox