From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "Qi Xi" <xiqi2@huawei.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <sunnanyong@huawei.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_isolation: fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:53:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKUVUULJAX9Y.V99RHS4OYGON@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821025501.2752563-2-xiqi2@huawei.com>
On Thu Aug 20, 2026 at 10:55 PM EDT, Qi Xi wrote:
> A contig-range allocation racing with buddy allocation on the adjacent
> pageblock can trigger:
>
> UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in mm/page_isolation.c:393:15
> shift exponent -749042176 is negative
> Call trace:
> isolate_single_pageblock
> start_isolate_page_range
> alloc_contig_frozen_range_noprof
> alloc_contig_range_noprof
>
> isolate_single_pageblock() first calls set_migratetype_isolate() with
> zone->lock held, which marks the pageblock MIGRATE_ISOLATE and moves any
> free page straddling the boundary out of the way. Once the lock is
> dropped, it scans the MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES-aligned window [start_pfn,
> boundary_pfn) locklessly, only to skip the free pages already handled
> above and to detect in-use pages straddling the boundary. Since this
> scan only reads page state to decide how far to skip and returns -EBUSY
> on a straddling in-use page, it does not take the lock.
>
> The window also covers the adjacent pageblock, whose free pages stay on
> the normal movable/CMA freelist and can be allocated concurrently. So
> after the scan observes PageBuddy(page), another CPU can allocate the
> page, leaving a stale value in page->private that makes "1 << order" shift
> out of range.
>
> Use buddy_order_unsafe() with READ_ONCE to read the order, and validate
> it is within MAX_PAGE_ORDER before shifting to prevent UBSAN warnings.
>
> Since pageblock_isolate_and_move_free_pages() already handles free pages
> straddling boundary_pfn under zone->lock, bail out with -EBUSY instead
> of VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() when a PageBuddy page appears to cross the boundary
> during the lockless scan.
>
> Fixes: b2c9e2fbba32 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/page_isolation.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> index 32ce8a7d9df3..f2b648a68531 100644
> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> @@ -387,13 +387,15 @@ static int isolate_single_pageblock(unsigned long boundary_pfn,
> }
>
> if (PageBuddy(page)) {
> - int order = buddy_order(page);
> + unsigned int order = buddy_order_unsafe(page);
>
> - /* pageblock_isolate_and_move_free_pages() handled this */
> - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(pfn + (1 << order) > boundary_pfn);
> -
> - pfn += 1UL << order;
> - continue;
> + /* buddy_order_unsafe() is racy. Validate the order before shifting. */
> + if (order <= MAX_PAGE_ORDER &&
Can you add a comment like below to clarify the check? Thanks.
/*
* pageblock_isolate_and_move_free_pages() splits
* cross-boundary PageBuddy, verify it.
*/
> + pfn + (1UL << order) <= boundary_pfn) {
> + pfn += 1UL << order;
> + continue;
> + }
> + goto failed;
> }
>
> /*
With that, feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 2:54 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/page_isolation: fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds in isolate_single_pageblock Qi Xi
2026-08-21 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_isolation: fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning Qi Xi
2026-08-21 19:53 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-08-21 2:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/page_isolation: guard compound_order() against racing Qi Xi
2026-08-21 19:54 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DKUVUULJAX9Y.V99RHS4OYGON@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=xiqi2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox