From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "Yeoreum Yun" <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Nico Pache" <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Dev Jain" <dev.jain@arm.com>, "Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Kevin Brodsky" <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kselftest: mm: replace usage of /proc/self/smaps for check_huge_xxx() helper
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 11:03:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKZTG6MI4EI2.35PCXKS36M1DY@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <apAVAvfxZSeEvf50@e129823.arm.com>
On Thu Aug 27, 2026 at 6:44 AM EDT, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
>>
>>
>> On 8/26/26 8:24 PM, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
>> > Since glibc commit 321e1fc73f (“malloc: Enable 2MB THP by default on AArch64”),
>> > glibc may call madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) for sufficiently large allocations
>> > made by memalign().
>> >
>> > The underlying VMA may start at a different address from the aligned
>> > address returned by memalign(). Furthermore, a subsequent
>> > madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) call does not split the VMA because the flag is
>> > already set.
>> >
>> > This causes split_huge_page_test to fail because the check_huge_xxx()
>> > helpers incorrectly require the address returned by memalign() to
>> > match the VMA start address reported in /proc/self/smaps.
>> >
>> > Fix this by using /proc/self/pagemap and /proc/kpageflags instead of
>> > /proc/self/smaps to detect huge pages.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
>> > ---
>> > tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> > tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h | 1 +
>> > 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
>> > index 4821a3563036..1d0959b3b9e8 100644
>> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
>> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
>> > @@ -351,31 +351,13 @@ char *__get_smap_entry(void *addr, const char *pattern, char *buf, size_t len)
>> > return entry;
>> > }
>> > -static bool __check_pmd_huge(void *addr, char *pattern, int nr_hpages,
>> > - uint64_t hpage_size)
>> > -{
>> > - char buffer[MAX_LINE_LENGTH];
>> > - uint64_t thp = -1;
>> > - char *entry;
>> > -
>> > - entry = __get_smap_entry(addr, pattern, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
>> > - if (!entry)
>> > - goto err_out;
>> > -
>> > - if (sscanf(entry, "%9" SCNu64 " kB", &thp) != 1)
>> > - ksft_exit_fail_msg("Reading smap error\n");
>> > -
>> > -err_out:
>> > - return thp == (nr_hpages * (hpage_size >> 10));
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > -static bool check_large_folios(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
>> > - uint64_t hpage_size)
>> > +static bool check_large_folios(int pagemap_fd, int kpageflags_fd,
>> > + void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
>> > + uint64_t hpage_size)
>> > {
>> > int order = 0, pagesize = getpagesize();
>> > unsigned int nr_pages = hpage_size / pagesize;
>> > int orders[MAX_NR_ORDERS], status;
>> > - int pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd;
>> > bool ret = false;
>> > if (!nr_pages)
>> > @@ -386,15 +368,6 @@ static bool check_large_folios(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
>> > ksft_exit_fail_msg("invalid order\n");
>> > memset(orders, 0, sizeof(int) * MAX_NR_ORDERS);
>> > - pagemap_fd = open(PAGEMAP_PATH, O_RDONLY);
>> > - if (pagemap_fd == -1)
>> > - ksft_exit_fail_msg("read pagemap fail\n");
>> > -
>> > - kpageflags_fd = open(KPAGEFLAGS_PATH, O_RDONLY);
>> > - if (kpageflags_fd == -1) {
>> > - close(pagemap_fd);
>> > - ksft_exit_fail_msg("read kpageflags fail\n");
>> > - }
>> > status = gather_folio_orders(addr, len, pagemap_fd,
>> > kpageflags_fd, orders, MAX_NR_ORDERS);
>> > @@ -405,48 +378,97 @@ static bool check_large_folios(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
>> > ret = true;
>> > out:
>> > - close(pagemap_fd);
>> > - close(kpageflags_fd);
>> > return ret;
>> > }
>> > -bool check_huge_anon(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages, uint64_t hpage_size)
>> > +enum check_huge_type {
>> > + CHECK_HUGE_ANON,
>> > + CHECK_HUGE_FILE,
>> > + CHECK_HUGE_SHMEM,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static bool __check_pmd_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
>> > + uint64_t hpage_size, enum check_huge_type type)
>>
>> The original __check_pmd_huge() is only for PMD-sized large folios, but now
>> it not only checks PMD-sized large folios but also mTHP large folios, which
>> I find confusing. Please keep its original semantics, and only check
>> PMD-sized large folios.
>
> But, It seems to valuable to check other page-flags than checking
> the large-folio only.
>
>>
>> > {
>> > - uint64_t pmd_pagesize = read_pmd_pagesize();
>> > + int pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd;
>> > + uint64_t pmd_pagesize, granule;
>> > + uint64_t categories, kpf;
>> > + unsigned long pfn;
>> > + bool check_large, huge_mapped;
>> > + char *start = addr;
>> > + char *end = start + len;
>> > + pmd_pagesize = read_pmd_pagesize();
>> > if (!pmd_pagesize)
>> > ksft_exit_fail_msg("reading PMD pagesize failed\n");
>> > - if (hpage_size == pmd_pagesize)
>> > - return __check_pmd_huge(addr, "AnonHugePages: ", nr_hpages, hpage_size);
>> > + if (nr_hpages > 0) {
>> > + check_large = true;
>> > + granule = hpage_size;
>> > + } else {
>> > + check_large = false;
>> > + granule = psize();
>> > + }
>>
>> This is incorrect for the mTHP large folio check. I already hit a selftest
>> failure. Please test your patches before sending them out.
>
> Since for a split case, large folio can be as-is but only remove
> the PMD mapping only, skipping the large_folio checking seems valid
> when nr_hpage is 0.
What split care are you referring to? split_huge_page_test() always
splits the folio.
>
> And the failure of test seems because of unmapped area after
> changinng the collapse-order. Therefore, it seems to fine with below
> patch:
>
> ---------------&<----------------------
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> index 1d0959b3b9e8..f174a76d2310 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> @@ -387,14 +387,14 @@ enum check_huge_type {
> CHECK_HUGE_SHMEM,
> };
>
> -static bool __check_pmd_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
> - uint64_t hpage_size, enum check_huge_type type)
> +static bool __check_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
> + uint64_t hpage_size, enum check_huge_type type)
> {
> int pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd;
> uint64_t pmd_pagesize, granule;
> uint64_t categories, kpf;
> unsigned long pfn;
> - bool check_large, huge_mapped;
> + bool check_large, check_huge_mapped, allow_nomap;
> char *start = addr;
> char *end = start + len;
>
> @@ -405,11 +405,20 @@ static bool __check_pmd_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
> if (nr_hpages > 0) {
> check_large = true;
> granule = hpage_size;
> + if (granule == pmd_pagesize)
> + check_huge_mapped = true;
> + else
> + check_huge_mapped = false;
> } else {
> check_large = false;
> granule = psize();
> }
The else is for nr_hpages == 0? But it looks like we allow negative
nr_hpages. Maybe add a bool expect_huge = nr_hpages > 0 to make it
explicit.
granule is an optimization for PAGE_IS_HUGE scanning? When we expect a
PMD mapping, we just scan at pmd_pagesize granularity, otherwise we
check every single page?
At the high level, the function looks good to me, the rules are:
1. if hpage_size == pmd_pagesize, we need to check PAGE_IS_HUGE and
check_large_folio() can be skipped, since we only care about mappings.
This checks for PMD mappings.
2. in other cases, check_large_folios() is always needed. This is for
mTHP checks.
I think the ifs at the beginning is confusing. Can we do something like
below to get rid of the ifs? I also moved KPF_* checks in a separate
function. Feel free to make changes if you find any issue there.
Thanks.
static bool check_huge_type(uint64_t categories, uint64_t kpageflags,
enum check_huge_type type)
{
bool file = categories & PAGE_IS_FILE;
bool swapbacked = kpageflags & KPF_SWAPBACKED;
switch (type) {
case CHECK_HUGE_ANON:
return !file;
case CHECK_HUGE_FILE:
return file && !swapbacked;
case CHECK_HUGE_SHMEM:
return file && swapbacked;
}
return false;
}
static bool __check_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
uint64_t hpage_size, enum check_huge_type type)
{
int pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd;
int nr_pmd_mappings = 0;
uint64_t pmd_pagesize, scan_mapping_size;
uint64_t categories, kpf;
unsigned long pfn;
bool check_pmd_mapping;
bool allow_nonpresent;
bool ret = false;
char *start = addr;
char *end = start + len;
pmd_pagesize = read_pmd_pagesize();
if (!pmd_pagesize)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("reading PMD pagesize failed\n");
check_pmd_mapping = hpage_size == pmd_pagesize;
scan_mapping_size = nr_hpages > 0 ? hpage_size : psize();
/* Some mTHP tests check a partially populated PMD-sized range. */
allow_nonpresent = (uint64_t)nr_hpages * hpage_size < len;
pagemap_fd = open(PAGEMAP_PATH, O_RDONLY);
if (pagemap_fd < 0)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("open pagemap fail\n");
kpageflags_fd = open(KPAGEFLAGS_PATH, O_RDONLY);
if (kpageflags_fd < 0) {
close(pagemap_fd);
ksft_exit_fail_msg("open kpageflags fail\n");
}
/* PTE-mapped large folios cannot be identified by PAGE_IS_HUGE. */
if (!check_pmd_mapping &&
!check_large_folios(pagemap_fd, kpageflags_fd, addr, len,
nr_hpages, hpage_size))
goto out;
for (; start < end; start += scan_mapping_size) {
categories = pagemap_scan_get_categories(pagemap_fd, start);
pfn = pagemap_get_pfn(pagemap_fd, start);
if (pfn == -1UL) {
if (!allow_nonpresent)
goto out;
continue;
}
if (pageflags_get(pfn, kpageflags_fd, &kpf))
ksft_exit_fail_msg("read kpageflags: %s\n", strerror(errno));
if (check_pmd_mapping && (categories & PAGE_IS_HUGE))
nr_pmd_mappings++;
if (kpf & KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL)
continue;
if (!check_huge_type(categories, kpf, type))
goto out;
}
if (check_pmd_mapping && nr_pmd_mappings != nr_hpages)
goto out;
ret = true;
out:
close(pagemap_fd);
close(kpageflags_fd);
return ret;
}
>
> + if (nr_hpages * hpage_size < len)
> + allow_nomap = true;
> + else
> + allow_nomap = false;
> +
> pagemap_fd = open(PAGEMAP_PATH, O_RDONLY);
> if (pagemap_fd < 0)
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("open pagemap fail\n");
> @@ -428,18 +437,15 @@ static bool __check_pmd_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
> categories = pagemap_scan_get_categories(pagemap_fd, start);
> pfn = pagemap_get_pfn(pagemap_fd, start);
> if (pfn == -1UL) {
> - if (check_large)
> + if (!allow_nomap)
> goto out;
> else
> continue;
> }
> if (pageflags_get(pfn, kpageflags_fd, &kpf))
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("read kpageflags: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> - huge_mapped = categories & PAGE_IS_HUGE;
> - if (check_large != huge_mapped) {
> - if (!check_large || granule == pmd_pagesize)
> + if (check_huge_mapped != !!(categories & PAGE_IS_HUGE))
> goto out;
> - }
> if (kpf & KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL)
> continue;
> if (!!(categories & PAGE_IS_FILE) != (type != CHECK_HUGE_ANON))
> @@ -458,17 +464,17 @@ static bool __check_pmd_huge(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages,
>
> bool check_huge_anon(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages, uint64_t hpage_size)
> {
> - return __check_pmd_huge(addr, len, nr_hpages, hpage_size, CHECK_HUGE_ANON);
> + return __check_huge(addr, len, nr_hpages, hpage_size, CHECK_HUGE_ANON);
> }
>
> bool check_huge_file(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages, uint64_t hpage_size)
> {
> - return __check_pmd_huge(addr, len, nr_hpages, hpage_size, CHECK_HUGE_FILE);
> + return __check_huge(addr, len, nr_hpages, hpage_size, CHECK_HUGE_FILE);
> }
>
> bool check_huge_shmem(void *addr, size_t len, int nr_hpages, uint64_t hpage_size)
> {
> - return __check_pmd_huge(addr, len, nr_hpages, hpage_size, CHECK_HUGE_SHMEM);
> + return __check_huge(addr, len, nr_hpages, hpage_size, CHECK_HUGE_SHMEM);
> }
>
>
> If it's good for you, I'll repost again.
>
> Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 12:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] kselftest: mm: fix some failure of split_huge_page_test Yeoreum Yun
2026-08-26 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kselftest: mm: prevent random failure of huge page split for khugepaged Yeoreum Yun
2026-08-27 10:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-27 11:11 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-08-26 12:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kselftest: mm: replace usage of /proc/self/smaps for check_huge_xxx() helper Yeoreum Yun
2026-08-27 8:28 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-27 9:11 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-08-27 10:44 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-08-27 15:03 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-08-27 16:54 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-08-28 1:00 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-27 10:56 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-27 11:07 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DKZTG6MI4EI2.35PCXKS36M1DY@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox