From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@amazon.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
abuehaze@amazon.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
alisaidi@amazon.com, blakgeof@amazon.com, brauner@kernel.org,
dgc@kernel.org, dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com, djwong@kernel.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, jackmanb@google.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, rvvandan@amazon.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:37:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ED9E1F18-6BBE-4E61-89EE-2D513EFFC12F@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911142102.2294202-1-dipiets@amazon.it>
On 11 Sep 2026, at 10:21, Salvatore Dipietro wrote:
> Commit 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace")
> introduced high-order folio allocations in the iomap buffered write
> path. When memory is fragmented, each failed costly-order allocation
> enters __alloc_pages_slowpath() which runs direct compaction and
> drain_all_pages(), causing a 0.38x throughput drop on PostgreSQL
> pgbench (simple-update) with 1024 clients on a 96-vCPU arm64 system.
>
> The root issue is that direct compaction is too expensive for hot
> allocation paths that have fallbacks to smaller allocations.
> __filemap_get_folio_mpol() already marks higher-order allocations with
> __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN, signalling that the caller can handle
> failure. However, the page allocator still attempts full direct
> compaction for costly orders with __GFP_NORETRY, which is unnecessarily
> aggressive when the caller will simply retry at a lower order.
>
> For costly-order allocations with __GFP_NORETRY, suppress direct reclaim
> for the whole slowpath by computing can_direct_reclaim (and hence
> can_compact) as false. The !can_direct_reclaim check near the top of
> the slowpath then short-circuits to nopage: no direct reclaim, no direct
> compaction and no drain_all_pages() IPI across every CPU. kswapd (and
> in turn kcompactd) is still woken further down for background
> defragmentation, so compaction keeps working for long-term system health
> while being removed from the latency-critical direct allocation path.
>
> Allocations that also request __GFP_THISNODE are exempted. That flag
> pairing identifies the local-node-first THP attempt issued by
> alloc_pages_mpol() (mempolicy.c), which relies on direct compaction to
> form transparent huge pages. __GFP_NOFAIL is exempted as well, so a
> must-not-fail allocation is never made to fail.
>
> Test environment:
> Hardware: AWS EC2 m8g.24xlarge (96 vCPU, arm64)
> 12x 1TB IO2 32000 IOPS RAID0 XFS
> OS: AL2023
> Kernel: v7.3-rc1
> Database: PostgreSQL 18.4
> Workload: pgbench simple-update, 1024 clients, 96 threads, 1200s
>
> Results (average of 3 runs, TPS):
> Config Avg TPS % vs baseline
> AL2023 stock 6.1 kernel (pre-5d8edfb900d5) 136,942 n/a
> v7.3-rc1 baseline (no patch) 59,408 -
> v7.3-rc1 + this patch 161,994 +172.7%
>
> The patch fully recovers the pre-5d8edfb900d5 performance, bringing
> throughput back above the pre-regression level and well clear of the
> ~59k baseline. The AL2023 6.1 row runs a kernel that predates commit
> 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace"), so it is not
> directly comparable, but it shows the pre-regression level and confirms
> that the ~59k baseline is the anomaly and not the norm.
>
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260403193535.9970-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#t [v1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260420161404.642-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v2]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260710143437.12379-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v3]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904115629.3993331-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v4]
> Fixes: 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@amazon.it>
> ---
> v5: Derive the decision into a local flag instead of mutating gfp_mask
> v4: Clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM early in the slowpath and exempt
> __GFP_THISNODE so THP attempt keeps using direct compaction
> v3: Move to mm/page_alloc.c, wake kcompactd instead of avoiding it
> v2: Move from fs/iomap/buffered-io.c to mm/filemap.c
> v1: Avoid compaction in iomap folio allocation
>
LGTM.
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 14:21 [PATCH v5] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations Salvatore Dipietro
2026-09-11 15:37 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-09-11 16:32 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-11 20:44 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ED9E1F18-6BBE-4E61-89EE-2D513EFFC12F@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=abuehaze@amazon.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
--cc=blakgeof@amazon.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com \
--cc=dipiets@amazon.it \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rvvandan@amazon.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox