From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:11:07 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] atomic_ulong_t In-Reply-To: <20070128132437.299596000@programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: References: <20070128131343.628722000@programming.kicks-ass.net> <20070128132437.299596000@programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel List-ID: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > provide an unsigned long atomic type. Is this really necessary? We have no atomic_uint_t type either. Could you use atomic_long_t instead? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org