From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:24:54 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Add PageMlocked() page state bit and lru infrastructure In-Reply-To: <20070215145138.GT10108@waste.org> Message-ID: References: <20070215012449.5343.22942.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20070215012459.5343.72021.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20070215020916.GS10108@waste.org> <20070215145138.GT10108@waste.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matt Mackall Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Christoph Hellwig , Arjan van de Ven , Nigel Cunningham , "Martin J. Bligh" , Peter Zijlstra , Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Matt Mackall wrote: > Fine. But -this- comment is still incorrect. If someone were to ask > "what does this bit mean?" they would go the list of bit definitions > and leave with the -wrong- answer. The page is not necessarily > mlocked, it's just on the lazy mlock list. Well maybe we need to redo all the comments there in a consistent way. The other comments are equally sparse. Takes me a long time when try to figure out the role of a particular bit. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org