linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove unswappable anonymous pages off the LRU
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:34:12 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702151830080.1471@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070215174957.f1fb8711.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Guys, this page-flag problem is really serious.  -mm adds PG_mlocked and
> PG_readahead and the ext4 patches add PG_booked (am currently fighting the
> good fight there).  There's ongoing steady growth in these things and soon
> we're going to be in a lot of pain.

Well is it possible to restrict some of the features to 64 bit only? There 
we have lots of page flags.

One additional measure that may be possible is to have a page type field
(maybe 3 bits long) that would consolidate a series of page flags that 
cannot occur together. But then we have issues with the atomicity of 
updates to that field.

F.e.

page_type = { SLAB, LRU, MLOCK, RESERVED, BUDDY, <add 3 more types here> }

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-16  2:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-15 21:05 [RFC] Remove unswappable anonymous pages off the LRU Christoph Lameter
2007-02-15 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2007-02-15 22:41   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-15 22:50     ` Rik van Riel
2007-02-15 22:53       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-15 23:19       ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-15 23:20       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-02-16  0:15         ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  1:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  1:24   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-16  1:40   ` Martin Bligh
2007-02-16  1:49     ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  2:21       ` Martin Bligh
2007-02-16  2:34       ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-02-16  2:48         ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  2:50           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  3:18             ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  3:36               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  3:42                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  3:50                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  4:02                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  4:07                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  4:03                     ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  4:14                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-02-16  4:15                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  4:57                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-16  5:16                           ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  5:25                             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  5:41                               ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  5:19                           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  4:24                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-16  8:15           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-02-16  9:11             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-16  9:19               ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-02-16 10:10             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16 10:17               ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-02-16 11:04                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-16  2:16     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  3:17       ` Martin Bligh
2007-02-16  3:29         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  8:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-02-16  2:15   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  2:55   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-16  5:02     ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0702151830080.1471@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).