From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:29:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback In-Reply-To: <46019F67.3010300@google.com> Message-ID: References: <20070116054743.15358.77287.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <45C2960B.9070907@google.com> <46019F67.3010300@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ethan Solomita Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Paul Menage , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Paul Jackson , Dave Chinner List-ID: On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote: > Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote: > > > > > Hi Christoph -- has anything come of resolving the NFS / OOM concerns > > > that > > > Andrew Morton expressed concerning the patch? I'd be happy to see some > > > progress on getting this patch (i.e. the one you posted on 1/23) through. > > > > Peter Zilkstra addressed the NFS issue. I will submit the patch again as > > soon as the writeback code stabilizes a bit. > > I'm pinging to see if this has gotten anywhere. Are you ready to > resubmit? Do we have the evidence to convince Andrew that the NFS issues are > resolved and so this patch won't obscure anything? The NFS patch went into Linus tree a couple of days ago and I have a new version ready with additional support to set per dirty ratios per cpu. There is some interest in adding more VM controls to this patch. I hope I can post the next rev by tomorrow. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org