From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:57:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback In-Reply-To: <20070321145254.1c1011b9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20070116054743.15358.77287.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <45C2960B.9070907@google.com> <46019F67.3010300@google.com> <20070321145254.1c1011b9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ethan Solomita , Paul Menage , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Paul Jackson , Dave Chinner List-ID: On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > The NFS patch went into Linus tree a couple of days ago > > Did it fix the oom issues which you were observing? Yes it reduced the dirty ratios to reasonable numbers in a simple copy operation that created large amounts of dirty pages before. The trouble is now to check if cpuset writeback patch still works correctly. Probably have to turn off block device congestion checks somehow. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org