From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes V9 In-Reply-To: <20070806181912.GS15714@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070806163254.GJ15714@us.ibm.com> <20070806163726.GK15714@us.ibm.com> <20070806181912.GS15714@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: anton@samba.org, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, wli@holomorphy.com, melgor@ie.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, agl@us.ibm.com List-ID: On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Uh, interleave_nodes() takes a policy. Hence I need a policy to use. > This was your suggestion, Christoph and I'm doing exactly what you > asked. That would make sense if the policy can be overridden. You may be able to avoid exporting mpol_new by callig just the functions that generate the interleave nodes. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org