From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de,
mtk-manpages@gmx.net, solo@google.com, eric.whitney@hp.com,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:17:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709121515210.3835@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1189527657.5036.35.camel@localhost>
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> Andi, Christoph, Mel [added to cc]:
>
> Any comments on these patches, posted 30aug? I've rebased to
> 23-rc4-mm1, but before reposting, I wanted to give you a chance to
> comment.
Sorry that it took some time but I only just got around to look at them.
The one patch that I acked may be of higher priority and should probably
go in immediately to be merged for 2.6.24.
> I'm going to add Mel's "one zonelist" series to my mempolicy tree with
> these patches and see how that goes. I'll slide Mel's patches in below
> these, as it looks like they're closer to acceptance into -mm.
That patchset will have a significant impact on yours. You may be able to
get rid of some of the switch statements. It would be great if we had some
description as to where you are heading with the incremental changes to
the memory policy semantics? I sure wish we would have something more
consistent and easier to understand.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-12 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-30 18:50 [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/5] Mem Policy: fix reference counting Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:48 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 9:45 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/5] Mem Policy: Use MPOL_PREFERRED for system-wide default policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:54 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:22 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/5] Mem Policy: MPOL_PREFERRED fixups for "local allocation" Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 18:58 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:34 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:51 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 9:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-12 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:35 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/5] Mem Policy: cpuset-independent interleave policy Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 21:20 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-12 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 13:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 17:17 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-12 21:59 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-13 13:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 17:19 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-09-13 18:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-09 6:15 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-10-09 13:39 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-10-09 18:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-09 19:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-30 18:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/5] Mem Policy: add MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED get_mempolicy() flag Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 19:07 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:42 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-14 20:24 ` [PATCH] " Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-11 16:20 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/5] Memory Policy Cleanups and Enhancements Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-11 19:12 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-11 18:45 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-12 22:17 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-09-13 13:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 15:31 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 15:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 18:23 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-13 18:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-14 2:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-14 8:53 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 15:06 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-14 17:46 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 18:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-16 18:02 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 20:14 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 20:03 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-14 20:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-16 18:05 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-16 19:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-16 21:22 ` Mel Gorman
2007-09-17 13:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 18:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-13 15:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-13 18:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 19:00 ` [PATCH] Fix NUMA Memory Policy Reference Counting Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 19:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 19:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-17 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-19 22:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-09-19 22:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-18 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0709121515210.3835@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mtk-manpages@gmx.net \
--cc=solo@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).