From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:02:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 23 of 24] serialize for cpusets In-Reply-To: <20070912061003.39506e07.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20070912061003.39506e07.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Paul Jackson List-ID: On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > I understand that SGI's HPC customers care rather a lot about oom handling > in cpusets. It'd be nice if people@sgi could carefully review-and-test > changes such as this before we go and break stuff for them, please. Is there some way that we can consolidate the cpuset and the !cpuset case? We have a cpuset_lock() for the cpuset case and now also the OOM bit. If both fall back to global in case of !CPUSET then we may be able to clean this up. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org