From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:21:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/5] Mem Policy: MPOL_PREFERRED fixups for "local allocation" In-Reply-To: <1189690525.5013.22.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <20070830185053.22619.96398.sendpatchset@localhost> <20070830185114.22619.61260.sendpatchset@localhost> <1189690525.5013.22.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, mtk-manpages@gmx.net, solo@google.com, eric.whitney@hp.com, Mel Gorman List-ID: On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > > Hmmm. But one wants mpol_to_str to represent the memory policy not the > > context information that may change through migration. What you > > do there is provide information from the context. You could add the > > nodemask but I think we need to have some indicator that this policy is > > referring to the local policy. > > True. I could make mpol_to_str return something like "*" for the > nodemask and document this as "any allowed". Or print (any) ? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org