From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:42:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 8/14] Reclaim Scalability: Ram Disk Pages are non-reclaimable In-Reply-To: <1190040039.5460.45.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <20070914205359.6536.98017.sendpatchset@localhost> <20070914205451.6536.39585.sendpatchset@localhost> <46EDDF0F.2080800@redhat.com> <1190040039.5460.45.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mel@csn.ul.ie, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, eric.whitney@hp.com, npiggin@suse.de List-ID: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > So, I think I should just mark ramfs address space as nonreclaimable, > similar to ram disk. Do you agree? Ack. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org