From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:07:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] hugetlb: search harder for memory in alloc_fresh_huge_page() In-Reply-To: <20070924162220.GA26104@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070906182134.GA7779@us.ibm.com> <20070914172638.GT24941@us.ibm.com> <20070924162220.GA26104@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, agl@us.ibm.com, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Yes, I'll keep tracking -mm with my series. I wonder, though, if it > would be possible to at least get the bugfixes for memoryless nodes in > hugetlb code (patches 1 and 2) in to -mm sooner rather than later (I can > fix your issues with the static variable, I hope). The other two patches > are more feature-like, so can be postponed for now. Sure. Please post them and CC me. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org