From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:39:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] hugetlb: fix pool allocation with empty nodes In-Reply-To: <20071002224719.GB13137@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070906182134.GA7779@us.ibm.com> <20070906182430.GB7779@us.ibm.com> <20071002224719.GB13137@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: anton@samba.org, wli@holomorphy.com, agl@us.ibm.com, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > A node has its bit in N_HIGH_MEMORY set if it has any memory regardless > of t type of memory. If a node has memory then it has at least one zone > defined in its pgdat structure that is located in the pgdat itself. > > And, indeed, if CONFIG_HIGHMEM is off, N_HIGH_MEMORY == N_NORMAL_MEMORY. > > So I think I'm ok? Yes that reasoning sounds sane. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org