From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, travis@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:39:21 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710091138250.32162@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710082255.05598.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> The tight memory restrictions on stack usage do not come about because
> of the difficulty in increasing the stack size :) It is because we want to
> keep stack sizes small!
>
> Increasing the stack size 4K uses another 4MB of memory for every 1000
> threads you have, right?
>
> It would take a lot of good reason to move away from the general direction
> we've been taking over the past years that 4/8K stacks are a good idea for
> regular 32 and 64 bit builds in general.
We already use 32k stacks on IA64. So the memory argument fail there.
> > I have some concerns about the medium NUMA systems (a few dozen of nodes)
> > also running out of stack since more data is placed on the stack through
> > the policy layer and since we may end up with a couple of stacked
> > filesystems. Most of the current NUMA systems on x86_64 are basically
> > two nodes on one motherboard. The use of NUMA controls is likely
> > limited there and the complexity of the filesystems is also not high.
>
> The solution has until now always been to fix the problems so they don't
> use so much stack. Maybe a bigger stack is OK for you for 1024+ CPU
> systems, but I don't think you'd be able to make that assumption for most
> normal systems.
Yes that is why I made the stack size configurable.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-09 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-04 3:59 [00/18] Virtual Compound Page Support V2 Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [01/18] vmalloc: clean up page array indexing Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [02/18] vunmap: return page array passed on vmap() Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [03/18] vmalloc_address(): Determine vmalloc address from page struct Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [04/18] Vcompound: Smart up virt_to_head_page() Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [05/18] Page flags: Add PageVcompound() Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [06/18] Vcompound: Update page address determination Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [07/18] Vcompound: Add compound_nth_page() to determine nth base page Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [08/18] GFP_VFALLBACK: Allow fallback of compound pages to virtual mappings Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [09/18] Vcompound: GFP_VFALLBACK debugging aid Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [10/18] Sparsemem: Use fallback for the memmap Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [11/18] Page allocator: Use a higher order allocation for the zone wait table Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [12/18] Wait: Allow bit_waitqueue to wait on a bit in a virtual compound page Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 11:56 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-04 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-04 12:25 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-04 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-04 17:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 19:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 19:39 ` Rik van Riel
2007-10-04 21:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-07 7:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-08 17:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-08 12:55 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-09 18:39 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-10-09 8:46 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-10 1:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-09 9:56 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-10 3:36 ` where to get ZONE_MOVABLE pathces? Jacky(GuangXiang Lee)
2007-10-10 10:32 ` Mel Gorman
2007-10-06 18:53 ` [13/18] x86_64: Allow fallback for the stack Bill Davidsen
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [14/18] Configure stack size Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 4:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-04 4:43 ` David Miller, Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-04 19:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 9:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-04 19:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [15/18] Fallback for temporary order 2 allocation Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [16/18] Virtual Compound page allocation from interrupt context Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [17/18] Virtual compound page freeing in " Christoph Lameter
2007-10-04 3:59 ` [18/18] SLUB: Use fallback for table of callers/freers of a slab cache Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0710091138250.32162@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).