From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:56:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds) In-Reply-To: <84144f020710231341p189435b1y5514e5be981b9b1c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20071023181615.GA10377@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <84144f020710231304h6cba8626na4ab4bec0acda7a0@mail.gmail.com> <84144f020710231341p189435b1y5514e5be981b9b1c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux MM List-ID: On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Yeah, but we're _not failing_ when debugging is enabled. Thus, it's > likely, that the _failing_ (non-debug) case has potential for more > order 0 allocs, no? I am just guessing here but maybe it's > slab_order() behaving differently from calculate_slab_order() so that > we see more order 0 pressure in SLUB than SLAB? Seesm that order 0 pressure is better than order 1? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org