From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:01:08 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: SLUB: Increasing partial pages In-Reply-To: <20080116214127.GA11559@parisc-linux.org> Message-ID: References: <20080116195949.GO18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080116214127.GA11559@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I sent you a mail on December 6th ... here are the contents of that > mail: Dec 6th? I was on vacation then and it seems that I was unable to reproduce the oopses. Can I get some backtraces or other information that would allow me to diagnose the problem? > Applying just patches 1-7 and 9 leads to a slight (0.34%) performance > reduction compared to slub. That is 6.45% versus slab, reduces to 6.79% > with the 8 patches applied. Patch 8 is the one that optimizes the fastpath. How much runtime variability have these tests? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org