From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:14:16 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: crash in kmem_cache_init In-Reply-To: <20080122231058.GB866@csn.ul.ie> Message-ID: References: <20080118213011.GC10491@csn.ul.ie> <20080118225713.GA31128@aepfle.de> <20080122195448.GA15567@csn.ul.ie> <20080122212654.GB15567@csn.ul.ie> <20080122225046.GA866@csn.ul.ie> <20080122231058.GB866@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Olaf Hering , Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , hanth Aravamudan , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, Linux MM , akpm@linux-foundation.org List-ID: On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote: > Rather it should be 2. I'll admit the physical setup of this machine is > .... less than ideal but clearly it's something that can happen even if > it's a bad idea. Ok. Lets hope that Pekka's find does the trick. But this would mean that fallback gets memory from node 2 for the page allocator. Then fallback alloc is going to try to insert it into the l3 of node 2 which is not there yet. So another ooops. Sigh. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org