From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:37:21 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu notifiers #v5 In-Reply-To: <20080131232842.GQ7185@v2.random> Message-ID: References: <20080131045750.855008281@sgi.com> <20080131171806.GN7185@v2.random> <20080131232842.GQ7185@v2.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Robin Holt , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Peter Zijlstra , steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com List-ID: On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I appreciate the review! I hope my entirely bug free and > strightforward #v5 will strongly increase the probability of getting > this in sooner than later. If something else it shows the approach I > prefer to cover GRU/KVM 100%, leaving the overkill mutex locking > requirements only to the mmu notifier users that can't deal with the > scalar and finegrined and already-taken/trashed PT lock. Mutex locking? Could you be more specific? I hope you will continue to do reviews of the other mmu notifier patchset? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org