From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:08:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] slub: Fallback to kmalloc_large for failing higher
 order allocs
In-Reply-To: <47B49E62.6020808@cs.helsinki.fi>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802141207230.1041@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
References: <20080214040245.915842795@sgi.com> <20080214040313.616551392@sgi.com>
 <20080214140614.GE17641@csn.ul.ie> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802141108530.32613@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
 <47B49520.4070201@cs.helsinki.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802141128430.375@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
 <47B49ADD.9010001@cs.helsinki.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802141153300.809@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
 <47B49E62.6020808@cs.helsinki.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
> 
> to this patch and the kmem_cache_alloc equivalent (which you might as well
> fold into one patch).

I would like to merge this patch into 2.6.25 and keep the other for mm to 
maybe merge in 2.6.26. Not sure how safe the general use of the fallback 
is. Definitely no problem for the kmalloc array.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>