From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:00:40 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] slub: Adjust order boundaries and minimum objects per slab. In-Reply-To: <47B6A928.7000309@cs.helsinki.fi> Message-ID: References: <20080215230811.635628223@sgi.com> <20080215230854.643455255@sgi.com> <47B6A928.7000309@cs.helsinki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, Matt Mackall List-ID: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote: > These look quite excessive from memory usage point of view. I saw you dropping > DEFAULT_MAX_ORDER to 4 but it seems a lot for embedded guys, at least? What would be a good max order then? 4 means we can allocate a 64k segment for 16 4k objects. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org