From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:50:50 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch] my mmu notifiers In-Reply-To: <20080219142725.GA23200@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <20080219084357.GA22249@wotan.suse.de> <20080219135851.GI7128@v2.random> <20080219142725.GA23200@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Jack Steiner Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Nick Piggin , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Robin Holt , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Peter Zijlstra , general@lists.openfabrics.org, Steve Wise , Roland Dreier , Kanoj Sarcar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com List-ID: On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Jack Steiner wrote: > In general, though, I agree. Most users of mmu_notifiers would likely > required a mutex or something equivalent. The skeletons shows how to do most of it using a spinlock and a counter. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org