From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:15:19 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [rfc 05/10] Sparsemem: Vmemmap does not need section bits In-Reply-To: <20080304091809.b02b1e16.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20080301040755.268426038@sgi.com> <20080301040814.772847658@sgi.com> <20080301133312.9ab8d826.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080304091809.b02b1e16.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > No. My point is that page_to_section() should return correct number. > (0 is not correct for pages in some section other than 'section 0') Ahh. Okay. > "Now" there are no users of page_to_section() if sparsemem_vmemmap > is configured. But it seems to be defined as generic function. > So, someone may use this function in future. Or we could just not define the function? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org