From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:19:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] use vmalloc for mem_cgroup allocation. In-Reply-To: <20080415105434.3044afb6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20080415105434.3044afb6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Andrew Morton , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "xemul@openvz.org" , lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, menage@google.com, "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML List-ID: On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On ia64, kmalloc() in mem_cgroup_create requires order-4 pages. But this is not > necessary to be phisically contiguous. And we'll see page allocation failure. > (Note: x86-32, which has small vmalloc area, has small mem_cgroup struct.) > For here, vmalloc is better. I need to get my virtualizable compound stuff in order. That would address these issues. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org