From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:06:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] Documentation: add node files to sysfs ABI In-Reply-To: <20080420022159.GA14037@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20080411234743.GG19078@us.ibm.com> <20080411234913.GH19078@us.ibm.com> <20080411235648.GA13276@suse.de> <20080412094118.GA7708@wotan.suse.de> <20080413034136.GA22686@suse.de> <20080414210506.GA6350@us.ibm.com> <20080417231617.GA18815@us.ibm.com> <20080417233615.GA24508@us.ibm.com> <20080420022159.GA14037@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Greg KH Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan , Nick Piggin , wli@holomorphy.com, agl@us.ibm.com, luick@cray.com, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > That violation is replicated in /proc/meminfo /proc/vmstat etc etc. > > Those are /proc files, not sysfs files :) Hmmm.. Maybe we need to have /proc/node/meminfo etc that replicates the /proc content for each node? Otherwise this cannot be symmetric because the different mount points have different requirements on how the output should look like. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org