From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:13:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 03 of 12] get_task_mm should not succeed if mmput() is running and has reduced In-Reply-To: <20080422223727.GQ24536@duo.random> Message-ID: References: <20080422223727.GQ24536@duo.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Nick Piggin , Jack Steiner , Peter Zijlstra , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Steve Wise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , linux-mm@kvack.org, Robin Holt , general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell List-ID: On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:23:16PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Missing signoff by you. > > I thought I had to signoff if I conributed with anything that could > resemble copyright? Given I only merged that patch, I can add an > Acked-by if you like, but merging this in my patchset was already an > implicit ack ;-). No you have to include a signoff if the patch goes through your custody chain. This one did. Also add a From: Christoph Lameter somewhere if you want to signify that the patch came from me. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org