From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:21:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 12] Core of mmu notifiers In-Reply-To: <20080423172432.GE24536@duo.random> Message-ID: References: <20080422223545.GP24536@duo.random> <20080423162629.GB24536@duo.random> <20080423172432.GE24536@duo.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Nick Piggin , Jack Steiner , Peter Zijlstra , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Steve Wise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , linux-mm@kvack.org, Robin Holt , general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell List-ID: On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > will go in -mm in time for 2.6.26. Let's put it this way, if I fail to > merge mmu-notifier-core into 2.6.26 I'll voluntarily give up my entire > patchset and leave maintainership to you so you move 1/N to N/N and > remove mm_lock-sem patch (everything else can remain the same as it's > all orthogonal so changing the order is a matter of minutes). No I really want you to do this. I have no interest in a takeover in the future and have done the EMM stuff only because I saw no other way forward. I just want this be done the right way for all parties with patches that are nice and mergeable. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org