From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 12] Core of mmu notifiers In-Reply-To: <20080423183718.GL24536@duo.random> Message-ID: References: <20080422223545.GP24536@duo.random> <20080422230727.GR30298@sgi.com> <20080423133619.GV24536@duo.random> <20080423144747.GU30298@sgi.com> <20080423155940.GY24536@duo.random> <20080423181928.GI24536@duo.random> <20080423183718.GL24536@duo.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Robin Holt , Nick Piggin , Jack Steiner , Peter Zijlstra , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Kanoj Sarcar , Roland Dreier , Steve Wise , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , linux-mm@kvack.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell List-ID: On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Yes, there's really no risk of races in this area after introducing > mm_lock, any place that mangles over ptes and doesn't hold any of the > three locks is buggy anyway. I appreciate the audit work (I also did > it and couldn't find bugs but the more eyes the better). I guess I would need to merge some patches together somehow to be able to review them properly like I did before . I have not reviewed the latest code completely. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org