From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:08:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [2/2] vmallocinfo: Add caller information In-Reply-To: <20080429084854.GA14913@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20080318222701.788442216@sgi.com> <20080318222827.519656153@sgi.com> <20080429084854.GA14913@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Arjan van de Ven List-ID: On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i pointed out how it should be done _much cleaner_ (and much smaller - > only a single patch needed) via stack-trace, without changing a dozen > architectures, and even gave a patch to make it all easier for you: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/19/568 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/21/88 > > in fact, a stacktrace printout is much more informative as well to > users, than a punny __builtin_return_address(0)! Sorry lost track of this issue. Adding stracktrace support is not a trivial thing and will change the basic handling of vmallocinfo. Not sure if stacktrace support can be enabled without a penalty on various platforms. Doesnt this require stackframes to be formatted in a certain way? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org