From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 13:34:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 02/18] hugetlb: factor out huge_new_page In-Reply-To: <20080501202520.GA12354@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20080423015429.834926000@nick.local0.net> <20080424235431.GB4741@us.ibm.com> <20080424235829.GC4741@us.ibm.com> <481183FC.9060408@firstfloor.org> <20080425165424.GA9680@us.ibm.com> <20080425192942.GB14623@us.ibm.com> <20080430204428.GC6903@us.ibm.com> <20080501202520.GA12354@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Andi Kleen , npiggin@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, abh@cray.com, wli@holomorphy.com List-ID: On Thu, 1 May 2008, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > I'm pretty sure when I first created alloc_huge_page_node(), you argued > for me *not* using page_to_nid() on the returned page because we expect > __GFP_THISNODE to do the right thing. I vaguely remember that the issue at that point was that you were trying to compensate for __GFP_THISNODE brokenness? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org