linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
	Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix PAE pmd_bad bootup warning
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 20:49:23 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805062043580.11647@blonde.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805061138580.32269@woody.linux-foundation.org>

Fix warning from pmd_bad() at bootup on a HIGHMEM64G HIGHPTE x86_32.

That came from 9fc34113f6880b215cbea4e7017fc818700384c2 x86: debug pmd_bad();
but we understand now that the typecasting was wrong for PAE in the previous
version: pagetable pages above 4GB looked bad and stopped Arjan from booting.

And revert that cded932b75ab0a5f9181ee3da34a0a488d1a14fd x86: fix pmd_bad
and pud_bad to support huge pages.  It was the wrong way round: we shouldn't
weaken every pmd_bad and pud_bad check to let huge pages slip through - in
part they check that we _don't_ have a huge page where it's not expected.

Put the x86 pmd_bad() and pud_bad() definitions back to what they have long
been: they can be improved (x86_32 should use PTE_MASK, to stop PAE thinking
junk in the upper word is good; and x86_64 should follow x86_32's stricter
comparison, to stop thinking any subset of required bits is good); but that
should be a later patch.

Fix Hans' good observation that follow_page() will never find pmd_huge()
because that would have already failed the pmd_bad test: test pmd_huge in
between the pmd_none and pmd_bad tests.  Tighten x86's pmd_huge() check?
No, once it's a hugepage entry, it can get quite far from a good pmd: for
example, PROT_NONE leaves it with only ACCESSED of the KERN_PGTABLE bits.

However... though follow_page() contains this and another test for huge
pages, so it's nice to keep it working on them, where does it actually get
called on a huge page?  get_user_pages() checks is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) to
to call alternative hugetlb processing, as does unmap_vmas() and others.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
---
So Hans' original hugepage leak remains unexplained and unfixed.
Hans, did you find that hugepage leak with a standard kernel, or were
you perhaps trying out some hugepage-using patch of your own, without
marking the vma VM_HUGETLB?  Or were you expecting the hugetlbfs file
to truncate itself once all mmappers had gone?  If the standard kernel
leaks hugepages, I'm surprised the hugetlb guys don't know about it.

 arch/x86/mm/pgtable_32.c     |    7 -------
 include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h |    9 +--------
 include/asm-x86/pgtable_64.h |    6 ++----
 mm/memory.c                  |    5 ++++-
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- 2.6.26-rc1/arch/x86/mm/pgtable_32.c	2008-05-03 21:54:41.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/arch/x86/mm/pgtable_32.c	2008-05-06 14:13:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -172,10 +172,3 @@ void reserve_top_address(unsigned long r
 	__FIXADDR_TOP = -reserve - PAGE_SIZE;
 	__VMALLOC_RESERVE += reserve;
 }
-
-int pmd_bad(pmd_t pmd)
-{
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(pmd_bad_v1(pmd) != pmd_bad_v2(pmd));
-
-	return pmd_bad_v1(pmd);
-}
--- 2.6.26-rc1/include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h	2008-05-03 21:55:10.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/include/asm-x86/pgtable_32.h	2008-05-06 14:13:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -88,14 +88,7 @@ extern unsigned long pg0[];
 /* To avoid harmful races, pmd_none(x) should check only the lower when PAE */
 #define pmd_none(x)	(!(unsigned long)pmd_val((x)))
 #define pmd_present(x)	(pmd_val((x)) & _PAGE_PRESENT)
-
-extern int pmd_bad(pmd_t pmd);
-
-#define pmd_bad_v1(x)							\
-	(_KERNPG_TABLE != (pmd_val((x)) & ~(PAGE_MASK | _PAGE_USER)))
-#define	pmd_bad_v2(x)							\
-	(_KERNPG_TABLE != (pmd_val((x)) & ~(PAGE_MASK | _PAGE_USER |	\
-					    _PAGE_PSE | _PAGE_NX)))
+#define pmd_bad(x) ((pmd_val(x) & (~PAGE_MASK & ~_PAGE_USER)) != _KERNPG_TABLE)
 
 #define pages_to_mb(x) ((x) >> (20-PAGE_SHIFT))
 
--- 2.6.26-rc1/include/asm-x86/pgtable_64.h	2008-05-03 21:55:10.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/include/asm-x86/pgtable_64.h	2008-05-06 14:13:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -158,14 +158,12 @@ static inline unsigned long pgd_bad(pgd_
 
 static inline unsigned long pud_bad(pud_t pud)
 {
-	return pud_val(pud) &
-		~(PTE_MASK | _KERNPG_TABLE | _PAGE_USER | _PAGE_PSE | _PAGE_NX);
+	return pud_val(pud) & ~(PTE_MASK | _KERNPG_TABLE | _PAGE_USER);
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long pmd_bad(pmd_t pmd)
 {
-	return pmd_val(pmd) &
-		~(PTE_MASK | _KERNPG_TABLE | _PAGE_USER | _PAGE_PSE | _PAGE_NX);
+	return pmd_val(pmd) & ~(PTE_MASK | _KERNPG_TABLE | _PAGE_USER);
 }
 
 #define pte_none(x)	(!pte_val((x)))
--- 2.6.26-rc1/mm/memory.c	2008-05-03 21:55:12.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/mm/memory.c	2008-05-06 14:13:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_
 		goto no_page_table;
 	
 	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
-	if (pmd_none(*pmd) || unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd)))
+	if (pmd_none(*pmd))
 		goto no_page_table;
 
 	if (pmd_huge(*pmd)) {
@@ -978,6 +978,9 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd)))
+		goto no_page_table;
+
 	ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
 	if (!ptep)
 		goto out;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

       reply	other threads:[~2008-05-06 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <b6a2187b0805051806v25fa1272xb08e0b70b9c3408@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20080506124946.GA2146@elte.hu>
     [not found]   ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805061435510.32567@blonde.site>
     [not found]     ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805061138580.32269@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2008-05-06 19:49       ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2008-05-06 20:06         ` [PATCH] x86: fix PAE pmd_bad bootup warning Linus Torvalds
2008-05-06 20:30           ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-08 16:07             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-06 20:22         ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-06 20:36           ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-07 23:39             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-06 20:42           ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 14:34             ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 14:39               ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 14:52               ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 15:11                 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 15:51                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 16:19                     ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 16:33                       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-08 16:51                         ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 17:16                           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-08 18:42                             ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 18:58                               ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-08 19:06                                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 18:48                             ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-08 19:49                               ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-08 20:08                                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 20:02                               ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 20:16                                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 23:15                                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-14 19:01                                   ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-09  9:03                                 ` Paul Mundt
2008-05-08 16:42                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 15:44                 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-07  4:40         ` Jeff Chua
2008-05-07  5:30           ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0805062043580.11647@blonde.site \
    --to=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).