From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 20:49:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 12/18] FS: ExtX filesystem defrag In-Reply-To: <20080407231341.ac45cd9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20080404230158.365359425@sgi.com> <20080404230228.523868817@sgi.com> <20080407231341.ac45cd9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman , andi@firstfloor.org, Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Pekka Enberg List-ID: On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:02:10 -0700 Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Support defragmentation for extX filesystem inodes > > > > Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter > > --- > > fs/ext2/super.c | 9 +++++++++ > > fs/ext3/super.c | 8 ++++++++ > > fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++++++++ > > One patch per fs would be preferable please. > > Is there much point in doing this if the ext2 user is mainly (or fully) > using `-o nobh'? The defrag is for inodes, not for buffer heads. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org