From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] swap_info: change to array of pointers
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:41:19 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910152324220.4447@sister.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091015111107.b505b676.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:48:01 +0100 (BST)
> Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> > --- si1/mm/swapfile.c 2009-10-14 21:25:58.000000000 +0100
> > +++ si2/mm/swapfile.c 2009-10-14 21:26:09.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static const char Unused_offset[] = "Unu
> >
> > static struct swap_list_t swap_list = {-1, -1};
> >
> > -static struct swap_info_struct swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
> > +static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
> >
>
> Could you add some comment like this ?
> ==
> nr_swapfile is never decreased.
> swap_info[type] pointer will never be invalid if it turns to be valid once.
>
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_swapfiles; i++) {
> smp_rmp();
> sis = swap_info[type];
> ....
> }
> Then, we can execute above without checking sis is valid or not.
> smp_rmb() is required when we do above loop without swap_lock().
I do describe this (too briefly?) in the comment on smp_wmb() where
swap_info[type] is set and nr_swapfiles raised, in swapon (see below).
And make a quick same-line comment on the corresponding smp_rmb()s.
Those seem more useful to me than such a comment on the
static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
I was about to add (now, in writing this mail) that /proc/swaps is
the only thing that reads them without swap_lock; but that's not
true, of course, swap_duplicate and swap_free (or their helpers)
make preliminary checks without swap_lock - but the difference
there is that (unless the pagetable has become corrupted) they're
dealing with a swap entry which was previously valid, so can by
this time rely upon swap_info[type] and nr_swapfiles to be safe.
> swapon_mutex() will be no help.
>
> Whether sis is used or not can be detelcted by sis->flags.
>
> > @@ -1675,11 +1674,13 @@ static void *swap_start(struct seq_file
> > if (!l)
> > return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < nr_swapfiles; i++, ptr++) {
> > - if (!(ptr->flags & SWP_USED) || !ptr->swap_map)
> > + for (type = 0; type < nr_swapfiles; type++) {
> > + smp_rmb(); /* read nr_swapfiles before swap_info[type] */
> > + si = swap_info[type];
>
> if (!si) ?
>
> > + if (!(si->flags & SWP_USED) || !si->swap_map)
> > continue;
> > if (!--l)
> > - return ptr;
> > + return si;
> > }
...
> > static void *swap_next(struct seq_file *swap, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> > {
> > - struct swap_info_struct *ptr;
> > - struct swap_info_struct *endptr = swap_info + nr_swapfiles;
> > + struct swap_info_struct *si = v;
> > + int type;
> >
> > if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
> > - ptr = swap_info;
> > - else {
> > - ptr = v;
> > - ptr++;
> > - }
> > + type = 0;
> > + else
> > + type = si->type + 1;
> >
> > - for (; ptr < endptr; ptr++) {
> > - if (!(ptr->flags & SWP_USED) || !ptr->swap_map)
> > + for (; type < nr_swapfiles; type++) {
> > + smp_rmb(); /* read nr_swapfiles before swap_info[type] */
> > + si = swap_info[type];
> > + if (!(si->flags & SWP_USED) || !si->swap_map)
...
> > @@ -1799,23 +1800,45 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __use
...
> > - if (type >= nr_swapfiles)
> > - nr_swapfiles = type+1;
> > - memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->extent_list);
> > + if (type >= nr_swapfiles) {
> > + p->type = type;
> > + swap_info[type] = p;
> > + /*
> > + * Write swap_info[type] before nr_swapfiles, in case a
> > + * racing procfs swap_start() or swap_next() is reading them.
> > + * (We never shrink nr_swapfiles, we never free this entry.)
> > + */
> > + smp_wmb();
> > + nr_swapfiles++;
> > + } else {
> > + kfree(p);
> > + p = swap_info[type];
> > + /*
> > + * Do not memset this entry: a racing procfs swap_next()
> > + * would be relying on p->type to remain valid.
> > + */
> > + }
...
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-15 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-15 0:44 [PATCH 0/9] swap_info and swap_map patches Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 0:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] swap_info: private to swapfile.c Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 14:57 ` Rik van Riel
2009-10-15 23:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-10-16 0:28 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 0:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] swap_info: change to array of pointers Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 2:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 22:41 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2009-10-15 23:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 23:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 23:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 15:02 ` Rik van Riel
2009-10-15 0:49 ` [PATCH 3/9] swap_info: include first_swap_extent Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 0:50 ` [PATCH 4/9] swap_info: miscellaneous minor cleanups Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 2:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 22:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-16 0:41 ` [PATCH 4/9 v2] " Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] swap_info: SWAP_HAS_CACHE cleanups Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 2:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 22:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 0:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] swap_info: swap_map of chars not shorts Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 2:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 22:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 23:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 0:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] swap_info: swap count continuations Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 3:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 19:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-15 21:17 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-16 0:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 23:53 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-16 1:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-16 2:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-16 4:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-16 4:49 ` Nitin Gupta
2009-10-16 6:30 ` [PATCH] mm: call pte_unmap() against a proper pte (Re: [PATCH 7/9] swap_info: swap count continuations) Daisuke Nishimura
2009-10-16 8:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 0:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] swap_info: note SWAP_MAP_SHMEM Hugh Dickins
2009-10-15 3:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 22:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-10-16 0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-15 0:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] swap_info: reorder its fields Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0910152324220.4447@sister.anvils \
--to=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).