From: Antigen_SEAXCH01@emc.com
To: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: minchan@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mgorman@suse.de
Subject: Antigen forwarded attachment
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:51:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SEAXCH01Ln5U9T3TGJ2003f6eaf@seaxch01.isilon.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 386 bytes --]
The body from the message "Re: [PATCH] mm: fix NR_ISOLATED_[ANON|FILE] mismatch", originally sent to you by linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org), has been forwarded to you from the Antigen Quarantine area.
This message body may have been re-scanned by Antigen and handled according to the appropriate scan job's settings.
<<Body of Message>>
[-- Attachment #2: Body of Message --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 3110 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:04:56PM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > When I looked at zone stat mismatch problem, I found
> > migrate_to_node doesn't decrease NR_ISOLATED_[ANON|FILE]
> > if check_range fails.
This is a bit misleading. It's not that the stats would be
inaccurate, it's that the pages would be leaked from the LRU, no?
> > It can make system hang out.
Did you spot this by code review only or did you actually run into
this? Because...
> > Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > mm/mempolicy.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > index 3d64b36..6bf0860 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -953,16 +953,16 @@ static int migrate_to_node(struct mm_struct *mm, int source, int dest,
> >
> > vma = check_range(mm, mm->mmap->vm_start, mm->task_size, &nmask,
> > flags | MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK, &pagelist);
> > - if (IS_ERR(vma))
> > - return PTR_ERR(vma);
> > -
> > - if (!list_empty(&pagelist)) {
> > + if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(vma);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + if (!list_empty(&pagelist))
> > err = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_node_page, dest,
> > false, MIGRATE_SYNC);
> > - if (err)
> > - putback_lru_pages(&pagelist);
> > - }
> > -
> > +out:
> > + if (err)
> > + putback_lru_pages(&pagelist);
>
> Good catch!
> This is a regression since following commit. So, I doubt we need
> all or nothing semantics. Can we revert it instead? (and probably
> we need more kind comment for preventing an accident)
I think it makes sense to revert. Not because of the semantics, but I
just don't see how check_range() could even fail for this callsite:
1. we pass mm->mmap->vm_start in there, so we should not fail due to
find_vma()
2. we pass MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK, so the discontig checks do not apply
and so can not fail
3. we pass MPOL_MF_MOVE | MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL, the page table loops will
continue until addr == end, so we never fail with -EIO
> commit 0def08e3acc2c9c934e4671487029aed52202d42
> Author: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue Oct 26 14:21:32 2010 -0700
>
> mm/mempolicy.c: check return code of check_range
We don't use this code to "check" the range, we use it to collect
migrate pages. There is no failure case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 18:51 Antigen_SEAXCH01 [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-19 19:08 Antigen forwarded attachment Antigen_SEAXCH01
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SEAXCH01Ln5U9T3TGJ2003f6eaf@seaxch01.isilon.com \
--to=antigen_seaxch01@emc.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).