From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
hch@infradead.org, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, David.Laight@aculab.com,
shorne@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] s390: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 20:52:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/S+i5Rodai25HNS@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0502208452b40b17572d18891ffee94e42484fa.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 02/21/23 at 01:26pm, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 19:48 +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 02/16/23 at 05:21pm, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 20:34 +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > By taking GENERIC_IOREMAP method, the generic generic_ioremap_prot(),
> > > > generic_iounmap(), and their generic wrapper ioremap_prot(), ioremap()
> > > > and iounmap() are all visible and available to arch. Arch needs to
> > > > provide wrapper functions to override the generic versions if there's
> > > > arch specific handling in its ioremap_prot(), ioremap() or iounmap().
> > > > This change will simplify implementation by removing duplicated codes
> > > > with generic_ioremap_prot() and generic_iounmap(), and has the equivalent
> > > > functioality as before.
> > > >
> > > > Here, add wrapper functions ioremap_prot() and iounmap() for s390's
> > > > special operation when ioremap() and iounmap().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > arch/s390/include/asm/io.h | 21 ++++++++------
> > > > arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 57 +++++++-------------------------------
> > > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch. This is a very clear improvement for us! I tested
> > > this series with s390 systems with and without the PCI memory-I/O (MIO)
> > > support and everything works as expected.
> > >
> > > One thing I did stumble upon but which is independent from this patch
> > > is that I think memremap(…, MEMREMAP_WB) on system RAM outside the
> > > direct map is broken for us. At least on systems without PCI memory-I/O
> > > support. I think with this series it would be much easier to fix
> > > though. Basically I think we would have to define arch_memremap_wb() to
> > > generic_ioremap_prot(…, PAGE_KERNEL) and then have iounmap() check
> > > is_ioremap_addr() to see if it is an actual mapping or an address
> > > cookie. But again this is independent of this patch which doesn't
> > > change the behavior in this area.
> >
> > OK, I can check this after this patchset done.
>
> Oh this wasn't meant as adding a task for you just a FYI. I'm already
> experimenting with this and plan to possibly send a patch that fixes
> the case of remapping system RAM once your series has landed. The thing
> is that memremap() is quite tricky for us whichever way you look at
> it.
>
> We don't have real MMIO on s390x and thus using memremap() for PCI MMIO
> spaces doesn't really work as the void* returned can still only be
> accessed using ioread()/iowrite() because only our special PCI access
> instructions work on the pseudo-MMIO addresses (with PCI MIO)
> respectively the address cookies. Obviously void* and memremap() really
> isn't the right tool if you need to use ioread()/iowrite() to access it
> and can't treat it as memory though.
Ah, I misunderstood it. Thanks for sharing and expect to see your post.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-21 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-16 12:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] mm: ioremap: Convert architectures to take GENERIC_IOREMAP way Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] hexagon: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-16 14:47 ` Baoquan He
2023-02-16 14:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-17 12:11 ` Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] openrisc: mm: remove unneeded early ioremap code Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] mm/ioremap: Define generic_ioremap_prot() and generic_iounmap() Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] mm: ioremap: allow ARCH to have its own ioremap method definition Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] mm/ioremap: add slab availability checking in ioremap_prot Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] arc: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] ia64: " Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] openrisc: " Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] s390: " Baoquan He
2023-02-16 16:21 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-21 11:48 ` Baoquan He
2023-02-21 12:26 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-21 12:52 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] sh: " Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] xtensa: " Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] parisc: " Baoquan He
2023-02-16 13:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-16 15:02 ` Baoquan He
2023-02-16 15:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-17 13:31 ` Baoquan He
2023-02-17 13:46 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-17 14:21 ` Baoquan He
2023-02-17 14:33 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-17 14:35 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-02-21 11:43 ` Baoquan He
2023-02-22 8:35 ` Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] mm/ioremap: Consider IOREMAP space in generic ioremap Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] powerpc: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] arm64 : mm: add wrapper function ioremap_prot() Baoquan He
2023-02-16 12:34 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] mm: ioremap: remove unneeded ioremap_allowed and iounmap_allowed Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/S+i5Rodai25HNS@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).