From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
sj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeelb@google.com,
muchun.song@linux.dev, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
linmiaohe@huawei.com, david@redhat.com, osalvador@suse.de,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com, damon@lists.linux.dev,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: change to return bool for isolate_movable_page()
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:44:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+z91pcxAuygc92J@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb877f73f4fff8d309611082ec740a7065b1ade0.1676424378.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 06:39:37PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Now the isolate_movable_page() can only return 0 or -EBUSY, and no users
> will care about the negative return value, thus we can convert the
> isolate_movable_page() to return a boolean value to make the code more
> clear when checking the movable page isolation state.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
A couple of nits below, not worth respinning the patch series for:
> diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> index c88b96b48be7..6b252f519c86 100644
> --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ extern int migrate_pages(struct list_head *l, new_page_t new, free_page_t free,
> unsigned long private, enum migrate_mode mode, int reason,
> unsigned int *ret_succeeded);
> extern struct page *alloc_migration_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private);
> -extern int isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);
> +extern bool isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);
You can drop the 'extern' here.
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1668,18 +1668,18 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> * We can skip free pages. And we can deal with pages on
> * LRU and non-lru movable pages.
> */
> - if (PageLRU(page)) {
> + if (PageLRU(page))
> isolated = isolate_lru_page(page);
> - ret = isolated ? 0 : -EBUSY;
> - } else
> - ret = isolate_movable_page(page, ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE);
> - if (!ret) { /* Success */
> + else
> + isolated = isolate_movable_page(page, ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE);
> + if (isolated) { /* Success */
I would have dropped the "/* Success */" here. Before, commenting
"!ret" is quite sensible, but "isolated" seems obviously success to me.
Thanks for doing all this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 10:39 [PATCH v3 0/4] Change the return value for page isolation functions Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: change to return bool for folio_isolate_lru() Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 15:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-15 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: change to return bool for isolate_lru_page() Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 15:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-15 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: hugetlb: change to return bool for isolate_hugetlb() Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 15:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-15 19:22 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-02-15 20:25 ` SeongJae Park
2023-02-16 2:04 ` Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: change to return bool for isolate_movable_page() Baolin Wang
2023-02-15 15:44 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-02-16 2:07 ` Baolin Wang
2023-02-16 22:46 ` Andrew Morton
2023-02-15 20:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Change the return value for page isolation functions Linus Torvalds
2023-02-15 20:26 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+z91pcxAuygc92J@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).