Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] mm/vmstat: Do not queue vmstat_update if tick is stopped

[Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 04:40:26PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 01:03:11PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Lines: 94
> > 
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 04:22:25PM +0100, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> > > From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > From the vmstat shepherd, for CPUs that have the tick stopped, do not
> > > queue local work to flush the per-CPU vmstats, since in that case the
> > > flush is performed on return to userspace or when entering idle. Also
> > > cancel any delayed work on the local CPU, when entering idle on nohz
> > > full CPUs. Per-CPU pages can be freed remotely from housekeeping CPUs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  mm/vmstat.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> > > index 472175642bd9..3b9a497965b4 100644
> > > --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> > > +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/page_ext.h>
> > >  #include <linux/page_owner.h>
> > >  #include <linux/migrate.h>
> > > +#include <linux/tick.h>
> > >  
> > >  #include "internal.h"
> > >  
> > > @@ -1990,19 +1991,23 @@ static void vmstat_update(struct work_struct *w)
> > >   */
> > >  void quiet_vmstat(void)
> > >  {
> > > +	struct delayed_work *dw;
> > > +
> > >  	if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> > >  		return;
> > >  
> > >  	if (!is_vmstat_dirty())
> > >  		return;
> > >  
> > > +	refresh_cpu_vm_stats(false);
> > > +
> > >  	/*
> > > -	 * Just refresh counters and do not care about the pending delayed
> > > -	 * vmstat_update. It doesn't fire that often to matter and canceling
> > > -	 * it would be too expensive from this path.
> > > -	 * vmstat_shepherd will take care about that for us.
> > > +	 * If the tick is stopped, cancel any delayed work to avoid
> > > +	 * interruptions to this CPU in the future.
> > >  	 */
> > > -	refresh_cpu_vm_stats(false);
> > > +	dw = &per_cpu(vmstat_work, smp_processor_id());
> > > +	if (delayed_work_pending(dw) && tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
> > > +		cancel_delayed_work(dw);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /*
> > > @@ -2024,6 +2029,9 @@ static void vmstat_shepherd(struct work_struct *w)
> > >  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > >  		struct delayed_work *dw = &per_cpu(vmstat_work, cpu);
> > >  
> > > +		if (tick_nohz_tick_stopped_cpu(cpu))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > >  		if (!delayed_work_pending(dw) && per_cpu(vmstat_dirty, cpu))
> > >  			queue_delayed_work_on(cpu, mm_percpu_wq, dw, 0);
> > 
> > All these checks are racy though. You may well eventually:
> > 
> > 1) Arm the timer after the CPU has entered in userspace
> > 2) Not arm the timer when the CPU has entered the kernel
> > 
> > How about converting that to an IPI instead? This should be a good candidate
> > for the future IPI deferment.
> > 
> > Another possible way to go is this:
> > 
> > 1) vmstat_shepherd completely ignores nohz_full CPUs
> > 2) vmstat_work is only ever armed locally
> > 3) A nohz_full CPU turning its local vmstat as dirty checks if vmstat_work is
> >    pending. If not, queue it, possibly through a self IPI (IRQ_WORK) to get
> >    away with current locking context.
> 
> I'm afraid there might be workloads where local vmstat touch is a
> hot-path.
> 
> > 3) Fold on idle if dirty
> > 4) Fold on user enter and disarm vmstat_work if pending
> > 
> > Does that sound possible?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> I guess so, but proper barriers would also work.
> 
> Do you have any particular reason for the 1-4 sequence above 
> instead of barriers?

I think a per-CPU atomic variable might be necessary, not just barriers.

Thanks.