public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
	weixugc@google.com, fvdl@google.com, bagasdotme@gmail.com,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: add nodes= arg to memory.reclaim"
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 10:57:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y52Scge3ynvn/mB4@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221216101820.3f4a370af2c93d3c2e78ed8a@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri 16-12-22 10:18:20, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:54:16 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> > I have noticed that the patch made it into Linus tree already. Can we
> > please revert it because the semantic is not really clear and we should
> > really not create yet another user API maintenance problem.
> 
> Well dang.  I was waiting for the discussion to converge, blissfully
> unaware that the thing was sitting in mm-stable :(  I guess the
> 
> 	Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 	Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> 	Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> 
> fooled me.

Hmm, as pointed out in http://lkml.kernel.org/r/Y5bsmpCyeryu3Zz1@dhcp22.suse.cz
I've failed to see through all the consequences of the implementation.
SO my bad here to add my ack before fully understanding all the
implications.

> I think it's a bit premature to revert at this stage.  Possibly we can
> get to the desired end state by modifying the existing code.  Possibly
> we can get to the desired end state by reverting this and by adding
> something new.

Sure if we can converge to a proper implementation during the rc phase
then it would be ok. I cannot speak for others but at least for me
upcoming 2 weeks would be mostly offline so I cannot really contribute
much. A revert would be much more easier from the coordination POV IMHO.

Also I do not think there is any strong reason to rush this in. I do not
really see any major problems to have this extension in 6.2

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-17  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-02 22:35 [PATCH v3] mm: Add nodes= arg to memory.reclaim Mina Almasry
2022-12-02 23:51 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-12-03  3:17 ` Muchun Song
2022-12-12  8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-13  0:54   ` Mina Almasry
2022-12-13  6:30     ` Huang, Ying
2022-12-13  7:48       ` Wei Xu
2022-12-13  8:51       ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-13 13:42         ` Huang, Ying
2022-12-13 13:30       ` Johannes Weiner
2022-12-13 14:03         ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-13 19:29           ` Mina Almasry
2022-12-14 10:23             ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-15  5:50               ` Huang, Ying
2022-12-15  9:21                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-16  3:02                   ` Huang, Ying
2022-12-15 17:58               ` Wei Xu
2022-12-16  8:40                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-13  8:33     ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-13 15:58       ` Johannes Weiner
2022-12-13 19:53         ` Mina Almasry
2022-12-14  7:20           ` Huang, Ying
2022-12-14  7:15         ` Huang, Ying
2022-12-14 10:43         ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-16  9:54   ` [PATCH] Revert "mm: add nodes= arg to memory.reclaim" Michal Hocko
2022-12-16 12:02     ` Mina Almasry
2022-12-16 12:22       ` Michal Hocko
2022-12-16 12:28     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-16 18:18     ` Andrew Morton
2022-12-17  9:57       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2022-12-19 22:42         ` Andrew Morton
2023-01-03  8:37           ` Michal Hocko
2023-01-04  8:41             ` Proactive reclaim/demote discussion (was Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: add nodes= arg to memory.reclaim") Huang, Ying
2023-01-18 17:21               ` Michal Hocko
2023-01-19  8:29                 ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y52Scge3ynvn/mB4@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox