From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:32:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8p76dkw4XCGcMYF@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120074217.GB26815@lst.de>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 08:42:17AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:50:09PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > After this patch same check in the end of the vunmap() becomes odd
> > because we fail a vmap() call on its entry if VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
> > flag is set. See the [1] patch in this series.
> >
> > Is there any reason for such duplication?
>
> Mostly just documentation for me to explain why no flushing is needed.
> But I can drop it.
>
Thanks.
--
Uladzislau Rezki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-20 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-19 10:02 cleanup vfree and vunmap Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] vmalloc: reject vmap with VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:46 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: remove __vfree Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:47 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: remove __vfree_deferred Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:47 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: move vmalloc_init and free_work down in vmalloc.c Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: call vfree instead of __vunmap from delayed_vfree_work Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: move __remove_vm_area out of va_remove_mappings Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-20 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-20 11:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: use remove_vm_area in __vunmap Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: move debug checks from __vunmap to remove_vm_area Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:50 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-20 7:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-20 11:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: refactor va_remove_mappings Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:50 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 16:45 ` cleanup vfree and vunmap Uladzislau Rezki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-21 7:10 Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-21 7:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-23 10:47 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8p76dkw4XCGcMYF@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).