cleanup vfree and vunmap

cleanup vfree and vunmap

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi all,

this little series untangles the vfree and vunmap code path a bit.

Note that it depends on 'Revert "remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: map/unmap metadata
region before/after use"' in linux-next.

Diffstat:
 vmalloc.c |  304 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)

[PATCH 01/10] vmalloc: reject vmap with VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS

[Christoph Hellwig]

VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS is just for use with vmalloc as it is tied to freeing
the underlying pages.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 0781c5a8e0e73d..6957d15d526e46 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2883,6 +2883,9 @@ void *vmap(struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
 
 	might_sleep();
 
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS))
+		return NULL;
+
 	/*
 	 * Your top guard is someone else's bottom guard. Not having a top
 	 * guard compromises someone else's mappings too.
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 01/10] vmalloc: reject vmap with VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:17AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS is just for use with vmalloc as it is tied to freeing
> the underlying pages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 0781c5a8e0e73d..6957d15d526e46 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2883,6 +2883,9 @@ void *vmap(struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
>  
>  	might_sleep();
>  
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS))
> +		return NULL;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Your top guard is someone else's bottom guard. Not having a top
>  	 * guard compromises someone else's mappings too.
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 02/10] mm: remove __vfree

[Christoph Hellwig]

__vfree is a subset of vfree that just skips a few checks, and which is
only used by vfree and an error cleanup path.  Fold __vfree into vfree
and switch the only other caller to call vfree() instead.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 6957d15d526e46..b989828b45109a 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2801,14 +2801,6 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
 	__vfree_deferred(addr);
 }
 
-static void __vfree(const void *addr)
-{
-	if (unlikely(in_interrupt()))
-		__vfree_deferred(addr);
-	else
-		__vunmap(addr, 1);
-}
-
 /**
  * vfree - Release memory allocated by vmalloc()
  * @addr:  Memory base address
@@ -2836,8 +2828,10 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
 
 	if (!addr)
 		return;
-
-	__vfree(addr);
+	if (unlikely(in_interrupt()))
+		__vfree_deferred(addr);
+	else
+		__vunmap(addr, 1);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
 
@@ -3104,7 +3098,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 
 	/*
 	 * If not enough pages were obtained to accomplish an
-	 * allocation request, free them via __vfree() if any.
+	 * allocation request, free them via vfree() if any.
 	 */
 	if (area->nr_pages != nr_small_pages) {
 		warn_alloc(gfp_mask, NULL,
@@ -3144,7 +3138,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	return area->addr;
 
 fail:
-	__vfree(area->addr);
+	vfree(area->addr);
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: remove __vfree

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:18AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> __vfree is a subset of vfree that just skips a few checks, and which is
> only used by vfree and an error cleanup path.  Fold __vfree into vfree
> and switch the only other caller to call vfree() instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 18 ++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 6957d15d526e46..b989828b45109a 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2801,14 +2801,6 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
>  	__vfree_deferred(addr);
>  }
>  
> -static void __vfree(const void *addr)
> -{
> -	if (unlikely(in_interrupt()))
> -		__vfree_deferred(addr);
> -	else
> -		__vunmap(addr, 1);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * vfree - Release memory allocated by vmalloc()
>   * @addr:  Memory base address
> @@ -2836,8 +2828,10 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
>  
>  	if (!addr)
>  		return;
> -
> -	__vfree(addr);
> +	if (unlikely(in_interrupt()))
> +		__vfree_deferred(addr);
> +	else
> +		__vunmap(addr, 1);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
>  
> @@ -3104,7 +3098,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If not enough pages were obtained to accomplish an
> -	 * allocation request, free them via __vfree() if any.
> +	 * allocation request, free them via vfree() if any.
>  	 */
>  	if (area->nr_pages != nr_small_pages) {
>  		warn_alloc(gfp_mask, NULL,
> @@ -3144,7 +3138,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	return area->addr;
>  
>  fail:
> -	__vfree(area->addr);
> +	vfree(area->addr);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
Makes sense to me.

Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 03/10] mm: remove __vfree_deferred

[Christoph Hellwig]

Fold __vfree_deferred into vfree_atomic, and call vfree_atomic early on
from vfree if called from interrupt context so that the extra low-level
helper can be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index b989828b45109a..fafb6227f4428f 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2769,20 +2769,6 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
 	kfree(area);
 }
 
-static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
-	 * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
-	 * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
-	 * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
-	 */
-	struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
-
-	if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)addr, &p->list))
-		schedule_work(&p->wq);
-}
-
 /**
  * vfree_atomic - release memory allocated by vmalloc()
  * @addr:	  memory base address
@@ -2792,13 +2778,19 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr)
  */
 void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
 {
-	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
+	struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
 
+	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
 	kmemleak_free(addr);
 
-	if (!addr)
-		return;
-	__vfree_deferred(addr);
+	/*
+	 * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
+	 * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
+	 * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
+	 * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
+	 */
+	if (addr && llist_add((struct llist_node *)addr, &p->list))
+		schedule_work(&p->wq);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2820,17 +2812,16 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
  */
 void vfree(const void *addr)
 {
-	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
+	if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) {
+		vfree_atomic(addr);
+		return;
+	}
 
+	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
 	kmemleak_free(addr);
+	might_sleep();
 
-	might_sleep_if(!in_interrupt());
-
-	if (!addr)
-		return;
-	if (unlikely(in_interrupt()))
-		__vfree_deferred(addr);
-	else
+	if (addr)
 		__vunmap(addr, 1);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm: remove __vfree_deferred

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Fold __vfree_deferred into vfree_atomic, and call vfree_atomic early on
> from vfree if called from interrupt context so that the extra low-level
> helper can be avoided.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index b989828b45109a..fafb6227f4428f 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2769,20 +2769,6 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
>  	kfree(area);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
> -	 * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
> -	 * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
> -	 * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
> -	 */
> -	struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
> -
> -	if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)addr, &p->list))
> -		schedule_work(&p->wq);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * vfree_atomic - release memory allocated by vmalloc()
>   * @addr:	  memory base address
> @@ -2792,13 +2778,19 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr)
>   */
>  void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
>  {
> -	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
> +	struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
>  
> +	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
>  	kmemleak_free(addr);
>  
> -	if (!addr)
> -		return;
> -	__vfree_deferred(addr);
> +	/*
> +	 * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
> +	 * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
> +	 * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
> +	 * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
> +	 */
> +	if (addr && llist_add((struct llist_node *)addr, &p->list))
> +		schedule_work(&p->wq);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -2820,17 +2812,16 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
>   */
>  void vfree(const void *addr)
>  {
> -	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
> +	if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) {
> +		vfree_atomic(addr);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  
> +	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
>  	kmemleak_free(addr);
> +	might_sleep();
>  
> -	might_sleep_if(!in_interrupt());
> -
> -	if (!addr)
> -		return;
> -	if (unlikely(in_interrupt()))
> -		__vfree_deferred(addr);
> -	else
> +	if (addr)
>  		__vunmap(addr, 1);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
Such folding makes sense to me.

Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 04/10] mm: move vmalloc_init and free_work down in vmalloc.c

[Christoph Hellwig]

Move these two functions around a bit to avoid forward declarations.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index fafb6227f4428f..daeb28b54663d5 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -89,17 +89,6 @@ struct vfree_deferred {
 };
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vfree_deferred, vfree_deferred);
 
-static void __vunmap(const void *, int);
-
-static void free_work(struct work_struct *w)
-{
-	struct vfree_deferred *p = container_of(w, struct vfree_deferred, wq);
-	struct llist_node *t, *llnode;
-
-	llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&p->list))
-		__vunmap((void *)llnode, 1);
-}
-
 /*** Page table manipulation functions ***/
 static int vmap_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 			phys_addr_t phys_addr, pgprot_t prot,
@@ -2449,48 +2438,6 @@ static void vmap_init_free_space(void)
 	}
 }
 
-void __init vmalloc_init(void)
-{
-	struct vmap_area *va;
-	struct vm_struct *tmp;
-	int i;
-
-	/*
-	 * Create the cache for vmap_area objects.
-	 */
-	vmap_area_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(vmap_area, SLAB_PANIC);
-
-	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
-		struct vmap_block_queue *vbq;
-		struct vfree_deferred *p;
-
-		vbq = &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, i);
-		spin_lock_init(&vbq->lock);
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vbq->free);
-		p = &per_cpu(vfree_deferred, i);
-		init_llist_head(&p->list);
-		INIT_WORK(&p->wq, free_work);
-	}
-
-	/* Import existing vmlist entries. */
-	for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
-		va = kmem_cache_zalloc(vmap_area_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT);
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!va))
-			continue;
-
-		va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
-		va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
-		va->vm = tmp;
-		insert_vmap_area(va, &vmap_area_root, &vmap_area_list);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Now we can initialize a free vmap space.
-	 */
-	vmap_init_free_space();
-	vmap_initialized = true;
-}
-
 static inline void setup_vmalloc_vm_locked(struct vm_struct *vm,
 	struct vmap_area *va, unsigned long flags, const void *caller)
 {
@@ -2769,6 +2716,15 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
 	kfree(area);
 }
 
+static void delayed_vfree_work(struct work_struct *w)
+{
+	struct vfree_deferred *p = container_of(w, struct vfree_deferred, wq);
+	struct llist_node *t, *llnode;
+
+	llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&p->list))
+		__vunmap((void *)llnode, 1);
+}
+
 /**
  * vfree_atomic - release memory allocated by vmalloc()
  * @addr:	  memory base address
@@ -4315,3 +4271,46 @@ static int __init proc_vmalloc_init(void)
 module_init(proc_vmalloc_init);
 
 #endif
+
+void __init vmalloc_init(void)
+{
+	struct vmap_area *va;
+	struct vm_struct *tmp;
+	int i;
+
+	/*
+	 * Create the cache for vmap_area objects.
+	 */
+	vmap_area_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(vmap_area, SLAB_PANIC);
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		struct vmap_block_queue *vbq;
+		struct vfree_deferred *p;
+
+		vbq = &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, i);
+		spin_lock_init(&vbq->lock);
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vbq->free);
+		p = &per_cpu(vfree_deferred, i);
+		init_llist_head(&p->list);
+		INIT_WORK(&p->wq, delayed_vfree_work);
+	}
+
+	/* Import existing vmlist entries. */
+	for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
+		va = kmem_cache_zalloc(vmap_area_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT);
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!va))
+			continue;
+
+		va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
+		va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
+		va->vm = tmp;
+		insert_vmap_area(va, &vmap_area_root, &vmap_area_list);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Now we can initialize a free vmap space.
+	 */
+	vmap_init_free_space();
+	vmap_initialized = true;
+}
+
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: move vmalloc_init and free_work down in vmalloc.c

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:20AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Move these two functions around a bit to avoid forward declarations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index fafb6227f4428f..daeb28b54663d5 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -89,17 +89,6 @@ struct vfree_deferred {
>  };
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vfree_deferred, vfree_deferred);
>  
> -static void __vunmap(const void *, int);
> -
> -static void free_work(struct work_struct *w)
> -{
> -	struct vfree_deferred *p = container_of(w, struct vfree_deferred, wq);
> -	struct llist_node *t, *llnode;
> -
> -	llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&p->list))
> -		__vunmap((void *)llnode, 1);
> -}
> -
>  /*** Page table manipulation functions ***/
>  static int vmap_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>  			phys_addr_t phys_addr, pgprot_t prot,
> @@ -2449,48 +2438,6 @@ static void vmap_init_free_space(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -void __init vmalloc_init(void)
> -{
> -	struct vmap_area *va;
> -	struct vm_struct *tmp;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Create the cache for vmap_area objects.
> -	 */
> -	vmap_area_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(vmap_area, SLAB_PANIC);
> -
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> -		struct vmap_block_queue *vbq;
> -		struct vfree_deferred *p;
> -
> -		vbq = &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, i);
> -		spin_lock_init(&vbq->lock);
> -		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vbq->free);
> -		p = &per_cpu(vfree_deferred, i);
> -		init_llist_head(&p->list);
> -		INIT_WORK(&p->wq, free_work);
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Import existing vmlist entries. */
> -	for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
> -		va = kmem_cache_zalloc(vmap_area_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT);
> -		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!va))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
> -		va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
> -		va->vm = tmp;
> -		insert_vmap_area(va, &vmap_area_root, &vmap_area_list);
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Now we can initialize a free vmap space.
> -	 */
> -	vmap_init_free_space();
> -	vmap_initialized = true;
> -}
> -
>  static inline void setup_vmalloc_vm_locked(struct vm_struct *vm,
>  	struct vmap_area *va, unsigned long flags, const void *caller)
>  {
> @@ -2769,6 +2716,15 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
>  	kfree(area);
>  }
>  
> +static void delayed_vfree_work(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> +	struct vfree_deferred *p = container_of(w, struct vfree_deferred, wq);
> +	struct llist_node *t, *llnode;
> +
> +	llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&p->list))
> +		__vunmap((void *)llnode, 1);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * vfree_atomic - release memory allocated by vmalloc()
>   * @addr:	  memory base address
> @@ -4315,3 +4271,46 @@ static int __init proc_vmalloc_init(void)
>  module_init(proc_vmalloc_init);
>  
>  #endif
> +
> +void __init vmalloc_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct vmap_area *va;
> +	struct vm_struct *tmp;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Create the cache for vmap_area objects.
> +	 */
> +	vmap_area_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(vmap_area, SLAB_PANIC);
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		struct vmap_block_queue *vbq;
> +		struct vfree_deferred *p;
> +
> +		vbq = &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, i);
> +		spin_lock_init(&vbq->lock);
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vbq->free);
> +		p = &per_cpu(vfree_deferred, i);
> +		init_llist_head(&p->list);
> +		INIT_WORK(&p->wq, delayed_vfree_work);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Import existing vmlist entries. */
> +	for (tmp = vmlist; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) {
> +		va = kmem_cache_zalloc(vmap_area_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT);
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!va))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		va->va_start = (unsigned long)tmp->addr;
> +		va->va_end = va->va_start + tmp->size;
> +		va->vm = tmp;
> +		insert_vmap_area(va, &vmap_area_root, &vmap_area_list);
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Now we can initialize a free vmap space.
> +	 */
> +	vmap_init_free_space();
> +	vmap_initialized = true;
> +}
> +
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 05/10] mm: call vfree instead of __vunmap from delayed_vfree_work

[Christoph Hellwig]

This adds an extra, never taken,  in_interrupt() branch, but will allow
to cut down the maze of vfree helpers.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index daeb28b54663d5..3c07520b8b821b 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ static void delayed_vfree_work(struct work_struct *w)
 	struct llist_node *t, *llnode;
 
 	llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&p->list))
-		__vunmap((void *)llnode, 1);
+		vfree(llnode);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 05/10] mm: call vfree instead of __vunmap from delayed_vfree_work

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:21AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This adds an extra, never taken,  in_interrupt() branch, but will allow
> to cut down the maze of vfree helpers.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index daeb28b54663d5..3c07520b8b821b 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ static void delayed_vfree_work(struct work_struct *w)
>  	struct llist_node *t, *llnode;
>  
>  	llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&p->list))
> -		__vunmap((void *)llnode, 1);
> +		vfree(llnode);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 06/10] mm: move __remove_vm_area out of va_remove_mappings

[Christoph Hellwig]

__remove_vm_area is the only part of va_remove_mappings that requires
a vmap_area.  Move the call out to the caller and only pass the vm_struct
to va_remove_mappings.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 3c07520b8b821b..09c6fcfdaeb7c9 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2614,18 +2614,15 @@ static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area,
 			set_direct_map(area->pages[i]);
 }
 
-/* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the VA's vm_struct. */
-static void va_remove_mappings(struct vmap_area *va, int deallocate_pages)
+/* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the vm_struct. */
+static void va_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
 {
-	struct vm_struct *area = va->vm;
 	unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
 	unsigned int page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
 	int flush_reset = area->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS;
 	int flush_dmap = 0;
 	int i;
 
-	__remove_vm_area(va);
-
 	/* If this is not VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS memory, no need for the below. */
 	if (!flush_reset)
 		return;
@@ -2691,7 +2688,8 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
 
 	kasan_poison_vmalloc(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
 
-	va_remove_mappings(va, deallocate_pages);
+	__remove_vm_area(va);
+	va_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
 
 	if (deallocate_pages) {
 		int i;
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 06/10] mm: move __remove_vm_area out of va_remove_mappings

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:22AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> __remove_vm_area is the only part of va_remove_mappings that requires
> a vmap_area.  Move the call out to the caller and only pass the vm_struct
> to va_remove_mappings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 3c07520b8b821b..09c6fcfdaeb7c9 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2614,18 +2614,15 @@ static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area,
>  			set_direct_map(area->pages[i]);
>  }
>  
> -/* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the VA's vm_struct. */
> -static void va_remove_mappings(struct vmap_area *va, int deallocate_pages)
> +/* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the vm_struct. */
> +static void va_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
>  {
> -	struct vm_struct *area = va->vm;
>  	unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
>  	unsigned int page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
>  	int flush_reset = area->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS;
>  	int flush_dmap = 0;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	__remove_vm_area(va);
> -
>  	/* If this is not VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS memory, no need for the below. */
>  	if (!flush_reset)
>  		return;
> @@ -2691,7 +2688,8 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
>  
>  	kasan_poison_vmalloc(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>  
> -	va_remove_mappings(va, deallocate_pages);
> +	__remove_vm_area(va);
> +	va_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
>  
>  	if (deallocate_pages) {
>  		int i;
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
A small nit here. IMHO, a va_remove_mappings() should be
renamed back to vm_remove_mappings() since after this patch
it starts deal with "struct vm_struct".

OK. After checking all patches this function will be renamed
anyway to vm_reset_perms().

Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

Re: [PATCH 06/10] mm: move __remove_vm_area out of va_remove_mappings

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:48:48PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> A small nit here. IMHO, a va_remove_mappings() should be
> renamed back to vm_remove_mappings() since after this patch
> it starts deal with "struct vm_struct".
> 
> OK. After checking all patches this function will be renamed
> anyway to vm_reset_perms().

І could rename it.  It's not that much more churn given that
the prototype is touched anyway.

Re: [PATCH 06/10] mm: move __remove_vm_area out of va_remove_mappings

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 08:41:37AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:48:48PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > A small nit here. IMHO, a va_remove_mappings() should be
> > renamed back to vm_remove_mappings() since after this patch
> > it starts deal with "struct vm_struct".
> > 
> > OK. After checking all patches this function will be renamed
> > anyway to vm_reset_perms().
> 
> І could rename it.  It's not that much more churn given that
> the prototype is touched anyway.
>
A new vm_reset_perms() name matches the VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS flag
what, i think, is totally fine.

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 07/10] mm: use remove_vm_area in __vunmap

[Christoph Hellwig]

Use the common helper to find and remove a vmap_area instead of open
coding it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 09c6fcfdaeb7c9..096633ba89965a 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2571,20 +2571,6 @@ struct vm_struct *find_vm_area(const void *addr)
 	return va->vm;
 }
 
-static struct vm_struct *__remove_vm_area(struct vmap_area *va)
-{
-	struct vm_struct *vm;
-
-	if (!va || !va->vm)
-		return NULL;
-
-	vm = va->vm;
-	kasan_free_module_shadow(vm);
-	free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
-
-	return vm;
-}
-
 /**
  * remove_vm_area - find and remove a continuous kernel virtual area
  * @addr:	    base address
@@ -2597,10 +2583,18 @@ static struct vm_struct *__remove_vm_area(struct vmap_area *va)
  */
 struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
 {
+	struct vmap_area *va;
+	struct vm_struct *vm;
+
 	might_sleep();
 
-	return __remove_vm_area(
-		find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long) addr));
+	va = find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
+	if (!va || !va->vm)
+		return NULL;
+	vm = va->vm;
+	kasan_free_module_shadow(vm);
+	free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
+	return vm;
 }
 
 static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area,
@@ -2666,7 +2660,6 @@ static void va_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
 static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
 {
 	struct vm_struct *area;
-	struct vmap_area *va;
 
 	if (!addr)
 		return;
@@ -2675,20 +2668,18 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
 			addr))
 		return;
 
-	va = find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
-	if (unlikely(!va)) {
+	area = remove_vm_area(addr);
+	if (unlikely(!area)) {
 		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
 				addr);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	area = va->vm;
 	debug_check_no_locks_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
 	debug_check_no_obj_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
 
 	kasan_poison_vmalloc(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
 
-	__remove_vm_area(va);
 	va_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
 
 	if (deallocate_pages) {
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm: use remove_vm_area in __vunmap

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the common helper to find and remove a vmap_area instead of open
> coding it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 09c6fcfdaeb7c9..096633ba89965a 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2571,20 +2571,6 @@ struct vm_struct *find_vm_area(const void *addr)
>  	return va->vm;
>  }
>  
> -static struct vm_struct *__remove_vm_area(struct vmap_area *va)
> -{
> -	struct vm_struct *vm;
> -
> -	if (!va || !va->vm)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	vm = va->vm;
> -	kasan_free_module_shadow(vm);
> -	free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
> -
> -	return vm;
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * remove_vm_area - find and remove a continuous kernel virtual area
>   * @addr:	    base address
> @@ -2597,10 +2583,18 @@ static struct vm_struct *__remove_vm_area(struct vmap_area *va)
>   */
>  struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
>  {
> +	struct vmap_area *va;
> +	struct vm_struct *vm;
> +
>  	might_sleep();
>  
> -	return __remove_vm_area(
> -		find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long) addr));
> +	va = find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
> +	if (!va || !va->vm)
> +		return NULL;
> +	vm = va->vm;
> +	kasan_free_module_shadow(vm);
> +	free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
> +	return vm;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area,
> @@ -2666,7 +2660,6 @@ static void va_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
>  static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
>  {
>  	struct vm_struct *area;
> -	struct vmap_area *va;
>  
>  	if (!addr)
>  		return;
> @@ -2675,20 +2668,18 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
>  			addr))
>  		return;
>  
> -	va = find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
> -	if (unlikely(!va)) {
> +	area = remove_vm_area(addr);
> +	if (unlikely(!area)) {
>  		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
>  				addr);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	area = va->vm;
>  	debug_check_no_locks_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>  	debug_check_no_obj_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>  
>  	kasan_poison_vmalloc(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
>  
> -	__remove_vm_area(va);
>  	va_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
>  
>  	if (deallocate_pages) {
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 08/10] mm: move debug checks from __vunmap to remove_vm_area

[Christoph Hellwig]

All these checks apply to the free_vm_area interface as well, so move
them to the common routine.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 096633ba89965a..4cb189bdd51499 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2588,11 +2588,20 @@ struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
 
 	might_sleep();
 
+	if (WARN(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr), "Trying to vfree() bad address (%p)\n",
+			addr))
+		return NULL;
+
 	va = find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
 	if (!va || !va->vm)
 		return NULL;
 	vm = va->vm;
+
+	debug_check_no_locks_freed(vm->addr, get_vm_area_size(vm));
+	debug_check_no_obj_freed(vm->addr, get_vm_area_size(vm));
 	kasan_free_module_shadow(vm);
+	kasan_poison_vmalloc(vm->addr, get_vm_area_size(vm));
+
 	free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
 	return vm;
 }
@@ -2664,10 +2673,6 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
 	if (!addr)
 		return;
 
-	if (WARN(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr), "Trying to vfree() bad address (%p)\n",
-			addr))
-		return;
-
 	area = remove_vm_area(addr);
 	if (unlikely(!area)) {
 		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
@@ -2675,11 +2680,6 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	debug_check_no_locks_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
-	debug_check_no_obj_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
-
-	kasan_poison_vmalloc(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
-
 	va_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
 
 	if (deallocate_pages) {
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: move debug checks from __vunmap to remove_vm_area

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> All these checks apply to the free_vm_area interface as well, so move
> them to the common routine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 096633ba89965a..4cb189bdd51499 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2588,11 +2588,20 @@ struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
>  
>  	might_sleep();
>  
> +	if (WARN(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr), "Trying to vfree() bad address (%p)\n",
> +			addr))
> +		return NULL;
> +
>  	va = find_unlink_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
>  	if (!va || !va->vm)
>  		return NULL;
>  	vm = va->vm;
> +
> +	debug_check_no_locks_freed(vm->addr, get_vm_area_size(vm));
> +	debug_check_no_obj_freed(vm->addr, get_vm_area_size(vm));
>  	kasan_free_module_shadow(vm);
> +	kasan_poison_vmalloc(vm->addr, get_vm_area_size(vm));
> +
>  	free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
>  	return vm;
>  }
> @@ -2664,10 +2673,6 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
>  	if (!addr)
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (WARN(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr), "Trying to vfree() bad address (%p)\n",
> -			addr))
> -		return;
> -
>  	area = remove_vm_area(addr);
>  	if (unlikely(!area)) {
>  		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
> @@ -2675,11 +2680,6 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	debug_check_no_locks_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
> -	debug_check_no_obj_freed(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
> -
> -	kasan_poison_vmalloc(area->addr, get_vm_area_size(area));
> -
>  	va_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
>  
>  	if (deallocate_pages) {
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap

[Christoph Hellwig]

vunmap only needs to find and free the vmap_area and vm_strut, so open
code that there and merge the rest of the code into vfree.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 4cb189bdd51499..791d906d7e407c 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2666,45 +2666,6 @@ static void va_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
 	set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_default_noflush);
 }
 
-static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
-{
-	struct vm_struct *area;
-
-	if (!addr)
-		return;
-
-	area = remove_vm_area(addr);
-	if (unlikely(!area)) {
-		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
-				addr);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	va_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
-
-	if (deallocate_pages) {
-		int i;
-
-		for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++) {
-			struct page *page = area->pages[i];
-
-			BUG_ON(!page);
-			mod_memcg_page_state(page, MEMCG_VMALLOC, -1);
-			/*
-			 * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
-			 * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
-			 */
-			__free_pages(page, 0);
-			cond_resched();
-		}
-		atomic_long_sub(area->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
-
-		kvfree(area->pages);
-	}
-
-	kfree(area);
-}
-
 static void delayed_vfree_work(struct work_struct *w)
 {
 	struct vfree_deferred *p = container_of(w, struct vfree_deferred, wq);
@@ -2757,6 +2718,9 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
  */
 void vfree(const void *addr)
 {
+	struct vm_struct *vm;
+	int i;
+
 	if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) {
 		vfree_atomic(addr);
 		return;
@@ -2766,8 +2730,32 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
 	kmemleak_free(addr);
 	might_sleep();
 
-	if (addr)
-		__vunmap(addr, 1);
+	if (!addr)
+		return;
+
+	vm = remove_vm_area(addr);
+	if (unlikely(!vm)) {
+		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
+				addr);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	va_remove_mappings(vm, true);
+	for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_pages; i++) {
+		struct page *page = vm->pages[i];
+
+		BUG_ON(!page);
+		mod_memcg_page_state(page, MEMCG_VMALLOC, -1);
+		/*
+		 * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
+		 * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
+		 */
+		__free_pages(page, 0);
+		cond_resched();
+	}
+	atomic_long_sub(vm->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
+	kvfree(vm->pages);
+	kfree(vm);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
 
@@ -2782,10 +2770,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
  */
 void vunmap(const void *addr)
 {
+	struct vm_struct *vm;
+
 	BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
 	might_sleep();
-	if (addr)
-		__vunmap(addr, 0);
+
+	if (!addr)
+		return;
+	vm = remove_vm_area(addr);
+	if (unlikely(!vm)) {
+		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vunmap() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
+				addr);
+		return;
+	}
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(vm->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS);
+	kfree(vm);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vunmap);
 
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:25AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> vunmap only needs to find and free the vmap_area and vm_strut, so open
> code that there and merge the rest of the code into vfree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 4cb189bdd51499..791d906d7e407c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2666,45 +2666,6 @@ static void va_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
>  	set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_default_noflush);
>  }
>  
> -static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
> -{
> -	struct vm_struct *area;
> -
> -	if (!addr)
> -		return;
> -
> -	area = remove_vm_area(addr);
> -	if (unlikely(!area)) {
> -		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
> -				addr);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	va_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
> -
> -	if (deallocate_pages) {
> -		int i;
> -
> -		for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++) {
> -			struct page *page = area->pages[i];
> -
> -			BUG_ON(!page);
> -			mod_memcg_page_state(page, MEMCG_VMALLOC, -1);
> -			/*
> -			 * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
> -			 * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
> -			 */
> -			__free_pages(page, 0);
> -			cond_resched();
> -		}
> -		atomic_long_sub(area->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
> -
> -		kvfree(area->pages);
> -	}
> -
> -	kfree(area);
> -}
> -
>  static void delayed_vfree_work(struct work_struct *w)
>  {
>  	struct vfree_deferred *p = container_of(w, struct vfree_deferred, wq);
> @@ -2757,6 +2718,9 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
>   */
>  void vfree(const void *addr)
>  {
> +	struct vm_struct *vm;
> +	int i;
> +
>  	if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) {
>  		vfree_atomic(addr);
>  		return;
> @@ -2766,8 +2730,32 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
>  	kmemleak_free(addr);
>  	might_sleep();
>  
> -	if (addr)
> -		__vunmap(addr, 1);
> +	if (!addr)
> +		return;
> +
> +	vm = remove_vm_area(addr);
> +	if (unlikely(!vm)) {
> +		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
> +				addr);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	va_remove_mappings(vm, true);
> +	for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_pages; i++) {
> +		struct page *page = vm->pages[i];
> +
> +		BUG_ON(!page);
> +		mod_memcg_page_state(page, MEMCG_VMALLOC, -1);
> +		/*
> +		 * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
> +		 * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
> +		 */
> +		__free_pages(page, 0);
> +		cond_resched();
> +	}
> +	atomic_long_sub(vm->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
> +	kvfree(vm->pages);
> +	kfree(vm);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
>  
> @@ -2782,10 +2770,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
>   */
>  void vunmap(const void *addr)
>  {
> +	struct vm_struct *vm;
> +
>  	BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
>  	might_sleep();
> -	if (addr)
> -		__vunmap(addr, 0);
> +
> +	if (!addr)
> +		return;
> +	vm = remove_vm_area(addr);
> +	if (unlikely(!vm)) {
> +		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vunmap() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
> +				addr);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(vm->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS);
> +	kfree(vm);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(vunmap);
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
After this patch same check in the end of the vunmap() becomes odd
because we fail a vmap() call on its entry if VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
flag is set. See the [1] patch in this series.

Is there any reason for such duplication?

--
Uladzislau Rezki

Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:50:09PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> After this patch same check in the end of the vunmap() becomes odd
> because we fail a vmap() call on its entry if VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
> flag is set. See the [1] patch in this series.
> 
> Is there any reason for such duplication?

Mostly just documentation for me to explain why no flushing is needed.
But I can drop it.

Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 08:42:17AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:50:09PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > After this patch same check in the end of the vunmap() becomes odd
> > because we fail a vmap() call on its entry if VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
> > flag is set. See the [1] patch in this series.
> > 
> > Is there any reason for such duplication?
> 
> Mostly just documentation for me to explain why no flushing is needed.
> But I can drop it.
>
Thanks.

--
Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 10/10] mm: refactor va_remove_mappings

[Christoph Hellwig]

Move the VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS to the caller and rename the function
to better describe what it is doing.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 27 ++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 791d906d7e407c..f41be986b01e4e 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2617,35 +2617,23 @@ static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area,
 			set_direct_map(area->pages[i]);
 }
 
-/* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the vm_struct. */
-static void va_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
+/*
+ * Flush the vm mapping and reset the direct map.
+ */
+static void vm_reset_perms(struct vm_struct *area)
 {
 	unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
 	unsigned int page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
-	int flush_reset = area->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS;
 	int flush_dmap = 0;
 	int i;
 
-	/* If this is not VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS memory, no need for the below. */
-	if (!flush_reset)
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * If not deallocating pages, just do the flush of the VM area and
-	 * return.
-	 */
-	if (!deallocate_pages) {
-		vm_unmap_aliases();
-		return;
-	}
-
 	/*
-	 * If execution gets here, flush the vm mapping and reset the direct
-	 * map. Find the start and end range of the direct mappings to make sure
+	 * Find the start and end range of the direct mappings to make sure that
 	 * the vm_unmap_aliases() flush includes the direct map.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i += 1U << page_order) {
 		unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)page_address(area->pages[i]);
+
 		if (addr) {
 			unsigned long page_size;
 
@@ -2740,7 +2728,8 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	va_remove_mappings(vm, true);
+	if (unlikely(vm->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS))
+		vm_reset_perms(vm);
 	for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_pages; i++) {
 		struct page *page = vm->pages[i];
 
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm: refactor va_remove_mappings

[Uladzislau Rezki]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:02:26AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Move the VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS to the caller and rename the function
> to better describe what it is doing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 27 ++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 791d906d7e407c..f41be986b01e4e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2617,35 +2617,23 @@ static inline void set_area_direct_map(const struct vm_struct *area,
>  			set_direct_map(area->pages[i]);
>  }
>  
> -/* Handle removing and resetting vm mappings related to the vm_struct. */
> -static void va_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
> +/*
> + * Flush the vm mapping and reset the direct map.
> + */
> +static void vm_reset_perms(struct vm_struct *area)
>  {
>  	unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
>  	unsigned int page_order = vm_area_page_order(area);
> -	int flush_reset = area->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS;
>  	int flush_dmap = 0;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	/* If this is not VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS memory, no need for the below. */
> -	if (!flush_reset)
> -		return;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If not deallocating pages, just do the flush of the VM area and
> -	 * return.
> -	 */
> -	if (!deallocate_pages) {
> -		vm_unmap_aliases();
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
> -	 * If execution gets here, flush the vm mapping and reset the direct
> -	 * map. Find the start and end range of the direct mappings to make sure
> +	 * Find the start and end range of the direct mappings to make sure that
>  	 * the vm_unmap_aliases() flush includes the direct map.
>  	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i += 1U << page_order) {
>  		unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)page_address(area->pages[i]);
> +
>  		if (addr) {
>  			unsigned long page_size;
>  
> @@ -2740,7 +2728,8 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	va_remove_mappings(vm, true);
> +	if (unlikely(vm->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS))
> +		vm_reset_perms(vm);
>  	for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_pages; i++) {
>  		struct page *page = vm->pages[i];
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.0
> 
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki

Re: cleanup vfree and vunmap

[Uladzislau Rezki]

Hello!

> Hi all,
> 
> this little series untangles the vfree and vunmap code path a bit.
> 
> Note that it depends on 'Revert "remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: map/unmap metadata
> region before/after use"' in linux-next.
> 
> Diffstat:
>  vmalloc.c |  304 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
>
I will go trough this refactoring tomorrow and get back with some comments.

Thanks!

--
Uladzislau Rezki

cleanup vfree and vunmap

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi all,

this little series untangles the vfree and vunmap code path a bit.

For the KASAN maintainers:  the interesting patch re KASAN is patch 8.

Note that it depends on 'Revert "remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: map/unmap metadata
region before/after use"' in linux-next.

Changes since v1:
 - drop an extra WARN_ON

Diffstat:
 vmalloc.c |  304 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)

[PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap

[Christoph Hellwig]

vunmap only needs to find and free the vmap_area and vm_strut, so open
code that there and merge the rest of the code into vfree.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 5b432508319a4f..6bd811e4b7561d 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2666,45 +2666,6 @@ static void vm_remove_mappings(struct vm_struct *area, int deallocate_pages)
 	set_area_direct_map(area, set_direct_map_default_noflush);
 }
 
-static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
-{
-	struct vm_struct *area;
-
-	if (!addr)
-		return;
-
-	area = remove_vm_area(addr);
-	if (unlikely(!area)) {
-		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
-				addr);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	vm_remove_mappings(area, deallocate_pages);
-
-	if (deallocate_pages) {
-		int i;
-
-		for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++) {
-			struct page *page = area->pages[i];
-
-			BUG_ON(!page);
-			mod_memcg_page_state(page, MEMCG_VMALLOC, -1);
-			/*
-			 * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
-			 * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
-			 */
-			__free_pages(page, 0);
-			cond_resched();
-		}
-		atomic_long_sub(area->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
-
-		kvfree(area->pages);
-	}
-
-	kfree(area);
-}
-
 static void delayed_vfree_work(struct work_struct *w)
 {
 	struct vfree_deferred *p = container_of(w, struct vfree_deferred, wq);
@@ -2757,6 +2718,9 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
  */
 void vfree(const void *addr)
 {
+	struct vm_struct *vm;
+	int i;
+
 	if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) {
 		vfree_atomic(addr);
 		return;
@@ -2766,8 +2730,32 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
 	kmemleak_free(addr);
 	might_sleep();
 
-	if (addr)
-		__vunmap(addr, 1);
+	if (!addr)
+		return;
+
+	vm = remove_vm_area(addr);
+	if (unlikely(!vm)) {
+		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
+				addr);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	vm_remove_mappings(vm, true);
+	for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_pages; i++) {
+		struct page *page = vm->pages[i];
+
+		BUG_ON(!page);
+		mod_memcg_page_state(page, MEMCG_VMALLOC, -1);
+		/*
+		 * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
+		 * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
+		 */
+		__free_pages(page, 0);
+		cond_resched();
+	}
+	atomic_long_sub(vm->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
+	kvfree(vm->pages);
+	kfree(vm);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
 
@@ -2782,10 +2770,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfree);
  */
 void vunmap(const void *addr)
 {
+	struct vm_struct *vm;
+
 	BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
 	might_sleep();
-	if (addr)
-		__vunmap(addr, 0);
+
+	if (!addr)
+		return;
+	vm = remove_vm_area(addr);
+	if (unlikely(!vm)) {
+		WARN(1, KERN_ERR "Trying to vunmap() nonexistent vm area (%p)\n",
+				addr);
+		return;
+	}
+	kfree(vm);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vunmap);
 
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap

[David Hildenbrand]

On 21.01.23 08:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> vunmap only needs to find and free the vmap_area and vm_strut, so open

s/vm_strut/vm_struct/

> code that there and merge the rest of the code into vfree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb